OB Nightingale betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 24 | 435 | 398 | 25.6 | 109.3 | 8.5 | 31.2 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where OB Nightingale scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Jersey (T20)MEDIUM sample
156 runs off 148 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 105.4 vs 109.3 overall, average 39.0 vs 25.6 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
214 runs off 214 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 100.0 vs 109.3 overall, average 35.7 vs 25.6 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
191 runs off 162 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 117.9 vs 109.3 overall, average 27.3 vs 25.6 overall.
- Venue: King George V Sports Ground, Castel (T20)LOW sample
133 runs off 104 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 127.9 vs 109.3 overall, average 33.3 vs 25.6 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
146 runs off 109 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 133.9 vs 109.3 overall, average 20.9 vs 25.6 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
246 runs off 245 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 100.4 vs 109.3 overall, average 24.6 vs 25.6 overall.
- Venue: Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg (T20)LOW sample
77 runs off 79 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 97.5 vs 109.3 overall, average 38.5 vs 25.6 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Jersey | T20 | 7 | 156 | 148 | 39.0 | 105.4 | 7.4 | 30.4 | MEDIUM |
| Germany | T20 | 2 | 50 | 55 | 25.0 | 90.9 | 7.3 | 34.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 7 | 133 | 104 | 33.3 | 127.9 | 12.5 | 26.0 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 3 | 77 | 79 | 38.5 | 97.5 | 5.1 | 34.2 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 3 | 60 | 56 | 30.0 | 107.1 | 8.9 | 33.9 | LOW |
| Sportpark Het Schootsveld, Deventer | T20 | 2 | 50 | 55 | 25.0 | 90.9 | 7.3 | 34.5 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 2 | 46 | 40 | 23.0 | 115.0 | 12.5 | 40.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 24 | 435 | 398 | 25.6 | 109.3 | 8.5 | 31.2 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 21 | 246 | 245 | 24.6 | 100.4 | 6.5 | 31.8 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 12 | 146 | 109 | 20.9 | 133.9 | 11.9 | 24.8 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 7 | 43 | 44 | — | 97.7 | 11.4 | 43.2 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 20 | 214 | 214 | 35.7 | 100.0 | 7.0 | 32.7 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 18 | 191 | 162 | 27.3 | 117.9 | 10.5 | 30.9 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.