OJR Groves betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 6 | 188 | 156 | 47.0 | 120.5 | 13.5 | 33.3 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 13 | 41 | 0 | 18.9 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where OJR Groves scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Serbia (T20)LOW sample
102 runs off 68 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 150.0 vs 120.5 overall, average 102.0 vs 47.0 overall.
- Venue: Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
102 runs off 68 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 150.0 vs 120.5 overall, average 102.0 vs 47.0 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
97 runs off 75 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 129.3 vs 120.5 overall, average 48.5 vs 47.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Happy Valley Ground 2 (T20)LOW sample
77 runs off 71 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 108.5 vs 120.5 overall, average 77.0 vs 47.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Serbia | T20 | 2 | 102 | 68 | 102.0 | 150.0 | 20.6 | 25.0 | LOW |
| Sweden | T20 | 1 | 77 | 65 | — | 118.5 | 9.2 | 29.2 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 2 | 77 | 71 | 77.0 | 108.5 | 8.5 | 35.2 | LOW |
| Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 102 | 68 | 102.0 | 150.0 | 20.6 | 25.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 6 | 188 | 156 | 47.0 | 120.5 | 13.5 | 33.3 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 4 | 97 | 75 | 48.5 | 129.3 | 13.3 | 24.0 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 5 | 43 | 54 | 21.5 | 79.6 | 9.3 | 51.9 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 6 | 127 | 99 | 127.0 | 128.3 | 15.2 | 31.3 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 3 | 55 | 36 | — | 152.8 | 16.7 | 19.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.