Omid Mailk Khel betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 17 | 463 | 374 | 33.1 | 123.8 | 16.3 | 38.2 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 5.5 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Omid Mailk Khel scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County (T20)MEDIUM sample
204 runs off 137 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 148.9 vs 123.8 overall, average 68.0 vs 33.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Portugal (T20)LOW sample
98 runs off 87 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 112.6 vs 123.8 overall, average 32.7 vs 33.1 overall.
- Venue: Stars Arena Hofstade, Zemst (T20)LOW sample
104 runs off 90 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 115.6 vs 123.8 overall, average 20.8 vs 33.1 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
117 runs off 116 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 100.9 vs 123.8 overall, average 58.5 vs 33.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Romania | T20 | 3 | 115 | 92 | 57.5 | 125.0 | 16.3 | 41.3 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 4 | 98 | 87 | 32.7 | 112.6 | 11.5 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Hungary | T20 | 2 | 90 | 51 | 90.0 | 176.5 | 27.5 | 39.2 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 1 | 39 | 44 | 39.0 | 88.6 | 9.1 | 40.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 5 | 204 | 137 | 68.0 | 148.9 | 21.9 | 38.0 | MEDIUM |
| Stars Arena Hofstade, Zemst | T20 | 5 | 104 | 90 | 20.8 | 115.6 | 15.6 | 38.9 | LOW |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 2 | 40 | 44 | 40.0 | 90.9 | 2.3 | 25.0 | LOW |
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 1 | 39 | 44 | 39.0 | 88.6 | 9.1 | 40.9 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 2 | 50 | 38 | 25.0 | 131.6 | 21.1 | 44.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 17 | 463 | 374 | 33.1 | 123.8 | 16.3 | 38.2 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 14 | 239 | 199 | 26.6 | 120.1 | 13.6 | 32.2 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 13 | 117 | 116 | 58.5 | 100.9 | 17.2 | 55.2 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 6 | 107 | 59 | 35.7 | 181.4 | 23.7 | 25.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 15 | 265 | 212 | 37.9 | 125.0 | 17.5 | 42.0 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 13 | 145 | 116 | 36.3 | 125.0 | 15.5 | 31.9 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 9 | 53 | 46 | 17.7 | 115.2 | 13.0 | 37.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.