P Mishra betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 31 | 393 | 338 | 16.4 | 116.3 | 15.7 | 47.6 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 878 | 1095 | 41 | 7.5 | 26.7 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where P Mishra scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Serbia (T20)MEDIUM sample
221 runs off 135 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 163.7 vs 116.3 overall, average 31.6 vs 16.4 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
181 runs off 127 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 142.5 vs 116.3 overall, average 12.9 vs 16.4 overall.
- Venue: National Sports Academy, Sofia (T20)LOW sample
116 runs off 78 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 148.7 vs 116.3 overall, average 29.0 vs 16.4 overall.
- Venue: Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
111 runs off 64 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 173.4 vs 116.3 overall, average 37.0 vs 16.4 overall.
- Venue: Marsa Sports Club (T20)LOW sample
79 runs off 62 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 127.4 vs 116.3 overall, average 15.8 vs 16.4 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
82 runs off 64 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 128.1 vs 116.3 overall, average 27.3 vs 16.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
188 runs off 179 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 105.0 vs 116.3 overall, average 23.5 vs 16.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Serbia | T20 | 7 | 221 | 135 | 31.6 | 163.7 | 24.4 | 37.8 | MEDIUM |
| Romania | T20 | 4 | 33 | 43 | 11.0 | 76.7 | 7.0 | 53.5 | LOW |
| Guernsey | T20 | 2 | 21 | 36 | 10.5 | 58.3 | 2.8 | 61.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| Serbia | T20 | 185 | 246 | 5 | 8.0 | 49.2 | MEDIUM |
| Gibraltar | T20 | 142 | 202 | 8 | 8.5 | 25.3 | LOW |
| Cyprus | T20 | 96 | 76 | 2 | 4.8 | 38.0 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 96 | 125 | 5 | 7.8 | 25.0 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 72 | 80 | 4 | 6.7 | 20.0 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 49 | 66 | 2 | 8.1 | 33.0 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 42 | 60 | 2 | 8.6 | 30.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| National Sports Academy, Sofia | T20 | 5 | 116 | 78 | 29.0 | 148.7 | 24.4 | 42.3 | LOW |
| Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 111 | 64 | 37.0 | 173.4 | 23.4 | 32.8 | LOW |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 5 | 79 | 62 | 15.8 | 127.4 | 19.4 | 53.2 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 3 | 25 | 43 | 12.5 | 58.1 | 2.3 | 55.8 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 6 | 9 | 38 | 1.8 | 23.7 | 0.0 | 73.7 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 4 | 31 | 33 | 15.5 | 93.9 | 9.1 | 45.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| National Sports Academy, Sofia | T20 | 136 | 208 | 8 | 9.2 | 26.0 | LOW |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 133 | 177 | 3 | 8.0 | 59.0 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 132 | 175 | 10 | 8.0 | 17.5 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 120 | 91 | 3 | 4.5 | 30.3 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 108 | 134 | 6 | 7.4 | 22.3 | LOW |
| Vassil Levski National Sports Academy, Sofia | T20 | 76 | 127 | 6 | 10.0 | 21.2 | LOW |
| Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground | T20 | 71 | 64 | 3 | 5.4 | 21.3 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 54 | 61 | 1 | 6.8 | 61.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 31 | 393 | 338 | 16.4 | 116.3 | 15.7 | 47.6 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 878 | 1095 | 41 | 7.5 | 26.7 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 19 | 188 | 179 | 23.5 | 105.0 | 14.0 | 53.1 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 19 | 181 | 127 | 12.9 | 142.5 | 18.9 | 36.2 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 5 | 24 | 32 | 12.0 | 75.0 | 12.5 | 62.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 778 | 907 | 36 | 7.0 | 25.2 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 76 | 147 | 5 | 11.6 | 29.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 25 | 196 | 171 | 16.3 | 114.6 | 15.8 | 45.6 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 18 | 115 | 103 | 12.8 | 111.7 | 13.6 | 49.5 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 82 | 64 | 27.3 | 128.1 | 18.8 | 50.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.