£
ExclusiveFreeBets
.com

P Molkenboer betting stats, splits & projections

Batter

Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.

Record by format

Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.

overallT205479583819.994.911.848.0HIGH
overallODI613526822.550.42.663.1MEDIUM
overallT20228172124.514.3MEDIUM
overallODI181013.310.0LOW

Why we like it

Splits where P Molkenboer scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.

  • Venue: Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur (T20)MEDIUM sample

    183 runs off 193 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 94.8 vs 94.9 overall, average 30.5 vs 19.9 overall.

  • Venue: Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam (T20)MEDIUM sample

    226 runs off 176 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 128.4 vs 94.9 overall, average 56.5 vs 19.9 overall.

  • Opposition: Germany (T20)LOW sample

    164 runs off 103 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 159.2 vs 94.9 overall, average 164.0 vs 19.9 overall.

  • Opposition: Scotland (ODI)LOW sample

    42 runs off 69 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 60.9 vs 50.4 overall, average 21.0 vs 22.5 overall.

Risks

Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.

  • Bowling type: SPIN (T20)HIGH sample

    353 runs off 437 balls in 42 T20 matches — strike rate 80.8 vs 94.9 overall, average 16.0 vs 19.9 overall.

  • Venue: Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht (T20)MEDIUM sample

    120 runs off 150 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 80.0 vs 94.9 overall, average 15.0 vs 19.9 overall.

  • Opposition: Scotland (T20)LOW sample

    66 runs off 88 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 75.0 vs 94.9 overall, average 9.4 vs 19.9 overall.

  • Opposition: Ireland (T20)LOW sample

    63 runs off 86 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 73.3 vs 94.9 overall, average 15.8 vs 19.9 overall.

  • Opposition: Thailand (T20)LOW sample

    45 runs off 75 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 60.0 vs 94.9 overall, average 9.0 vs 19.9 overall.

  • Venue: VRA Ground, Amstelveen (T20)LOW sample

    50 runs off 64 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 78.1 vs 94.9 overall, average 16.7 vs 19.9 overall.

Against each opponent

Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.

Papua New GuineaODI27714438.553.52.159.0MEDIUM
GermanyT202164103164.0159.225.234.0LOW
ScotlandT20866889.475.09.154.5LOW
IrelandT206638615.873.35.852.3LOW
ThailandT20645759.060.04.054.7LOW
ScotlandODI2426921.060.95.863.8LOW
NepalT204696823.0101.511.844.1LOW
United States of AmericaT203646532.098.513.850.8LOW
ThailandODI216558.029.10.072.7LOW
Hong KongT204465515.383.65.540.0LOW
BangladeshT204444211.0104.819.054.8LOW
South AfricaT201414141.0100.09.839.0LOW
ItalyT203353935.089.710.348.7LOW
JerseyT203443944.0112.87.725.6LOW

Bowling

ScotlandT20664353.98.6LOW
IrelandT20543724.118.5LOW

By venue

Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.

VRA Ground, AmstelveenODI513326126.651.02.762.8MEDIUM
Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, KirtipurT20918319330.594.811.446.6MEDIUM
Hazelaarweg, RotterdamT20622617656.5128.419.944.3MEDIUM
Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, UtrechtT201212015015.080.05.344.7MEDIUM
Terdthai Cricket Ground, BangkokT205637115.888.716.960.6LOW
VRA Ground, AmstelveenT205506416.778.14.742.2LOW
County Ground, BristolT202494849.0102.110.437.5LOW
Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, EdinburghT20437359.3105.717.148.6LOW
Asian Institute of Technology Ground, BangkokT20219339.557.69.172.7LOW

Bowling

Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, UtrechtT20967154.414.2LOW
Desert Springs Cricket Ground, AlmeriaT20604454.48.8LOW
VRA Ground, AmstelveenT20543724.118.5LOW

By country

Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.

UnknownT205479583819.994.911.848.0HIGH
UnknownODI613526822.550.42.663.1MEDIUM

Bowling

UnknownT20228172124.514.3MEDIUM

By match phase

Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.

powerplayT204040844720.491.314.156.6HIGH
middleT202430229420.1102.711.240.8MEDIUM
middleODI48115727.051.61.959.2MEDIUM
deathT2014859717.087.63.129.9LOW
powerplayODI4428921.047.24.571.9LOW

Bowling

middleT2015011974.817.0MEDIUM
deathT20785354.110.6LOW

Against pace and spin

Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.

SPINT204235343716.080.87.848.7HIGH
PACET204335334725.2101.714.449.6HIGH
SPINODI57716615.446.41.862.7MEDIUM
UNKNOWNT2012895422.3164.827.831.5LOW
UNKNOWNODI12753—50.93.866.0LOW
PACEODI6314931.063.34.161.2LOW

How these splits are used

The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.