P Pushparajan betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 20 | 607 | 385 | 31.9 | 157.7 | 21.6 | 34.5 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 271 | 343 | 12 | 7.6 | 28.6 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where P Pushparajan scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Gibraltar (T20)MEDIUM sample
225 runs off 125 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 180.0 vs 157.7 overall, average 45.0 vs 31.9 overall.
- Venue: Marsa Sports Club (T20)MEDIUM sample
392 runs off 214 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 183.2 vs 157.7 overall, average 49.0 vs 31.9 overall.
- Opposition: Estonia (T20)LOW sample
167 runs off 89 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 187.6 vs 157.7 overall, average 55.7 vs 31.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
258 runs off 184 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 140.2 vs 157.7 overall, average 25.8 vs 31.9 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
263 runs off 178 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 147.8 vs 157.7 overall, average 32.9 vs 31.9 overall.
- Venue: Happy Valley Ground (T20)LOW sample
79 runs off 62 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 127.4 vs 157.7 overall, average 26.3 vs 31.9 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Gibraltar | T20 | 5 | 225 | 125 | 45.0 | 180.0 | 24.0 | 28.8 | MEDIUM |
| Estonia | T20 | 3 | 167 | 89 | 55.7 | 187.6 | 27.0 | 24.7 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 1 | 46 | 41 | 46.0 | 112.2 | 14.6 | 48.8 | LOW |
| Sweden | T20 | 1 | 52 | 35 | 52.0 | 148.6 | 22.9 | 34.3 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 3 | 32 | 32 | 10.7 | 100.0 | 9.4 | 46.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Gibraltar | T20 | 108 | 128 | 3 | 7.1 | 42.7 | LOW |
| Estonia | T20 | 48 | 58 | 6 | 7.3 | 9.7 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 43 | 63 | 1 | 8.8 | 63.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 8 | 392 | 214 | 49.0 | 183.2 | 25.2 | 27.1 | MEDIUM |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 3 | 79 | 62 | 26.3 | 127.4 | 16.1 | 37.1 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 3 | 59 | 56 | 19.7 | 105.4 | 12.5 | 51.8 | LOW |
| Stars Arena Hofstade, Zemst | T20 | 4 | 39 | 32 | 9.8 | 121.9 | 15.6 | 43.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 156 | 186 | 9 | 7.2 | 20.7 | MEDIUM |
| Stars Arena Hofstade, Zemst | T20 | 50 | 68 | 0 | 8.2 | — | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 20 | 607 | 385 | 31.9 | 157.7 | 21.6 | 34.5 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 271 | 343 | 12 | 7.6 | 28.6 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 12 | 329 | 200 | 36.6 | 164.5 | 21.5 | 28.5 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 20 | 263 | 178 | 32.9 | 147.8 | 21.3 | 41.6 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 211 | 248 | 9 | 7.1 | 27.6 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 60 | 95 | 3 | 9.5 | 31.7 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 19 | 258 | 184 | 25.8 | 140.2 | 18.5 | 39.7 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 12 | 220 | 143 | 27.5 | 153.8 | 21.0 | 37.8 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 9 | 129 | 58 | 129.0 | 222.4 | 32.8 | 10.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.