P Sabu betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 14 | 241 | 261 | 20.1 | 92.3 | 8.4 | 43.7 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 255 | 214 | 19 | 5.0 | 11.3 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where P Sabu scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Luxembourg (T20)LOW sample
95 runs off 77 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 123.4 vs 92.3 overall, average 95.0 vs 20.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
No split is materially below their own format baseline.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Luxembourg | T20 | 2 | 95 | 77 | 95.0 | 123.4 | 11.7 | 31.2 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 2 | 27 | 44 | 13.5 | 61.4 | 4.5 | 59.1 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 1 | 19 | 42 | 19.0 | 45.2 | 4.8 | 73.8 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 1 | 38 | 31 | — | 122.6 | 12.9 | 12.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Czech Republic | T20 | 42 | 22 | 3 | 3.1 | 7.3 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 39 | 25 | 3 | 3.8 | 8.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 8 | 104 | 117 | 14.9 | 88.9 | 6.8 | 38.5 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club 2 | T20 | 1 | 63 | 52 | 63.0 | 121.2 | 13.5 | 34.6 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 1 | 19 | 42 | 19.0 | 45.2 | 4.8 | 73.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 132 | 118 | 13 | 5.4 | 9.1 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 42 | 32 | 1 | 4.6 | 32.0 | LOW |
| Pierre Werner Cricket Ground | T20 | 36 | 42 | 1 | 7.0 | 42.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 14 | 241 | 261 | 20.1 | 92.3 | 8.4 | 43.7 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 255 | 214 | 19 | 5.0 | 11.3 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 14 | 149 | 169 | 18.6 | 88.2 | 7.1 | 45.6 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 6 | 92 | 92 | 23.0 | 100.0 | 10.9 | 40.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 120 | 92 | 8 | 4.6 | 11.5 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 75 | 70 | 4 | 5.6 | 17.5 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 60 | 52 | 7 | 5.2 | 7.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 13 | 175 | 183 | 19.4 | 95.6 | 9.3 | 44.8 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 5 | 58 | 61 | 29.0 | 95.1 | 8.2 | 34.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.