P Siaka betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 30 | 363 | 315 | 14.5 | 115.2 | 13.3 | 39.7 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 7 | 160 | 228 | 22.9 | 70.2 | 7.5 | 56.6 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 484 | 348 | 33 | 4.3 | 10.5 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 132 | 81 | 5 | 3.7 | 16.2 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where P Siaka scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
189 runs off 131 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 144.3 vs 115.2 overall, average 15.8 vs 14.5 overall.
- Opposition: Scotland (ODI)LOW sample
58 runs off 74 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 78.4 vs 70.2 overall, average 19.3 vs 22.9 overall.
- Venue: Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht (ODI)LOW sample
70 runs off 86 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 81.4 vs 70.2 overall, average 35.0 vs 22.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
162 runs off 172 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 94.2 vs 115.2 overall, average 16.2 vs 14.5 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 4 | 99 | 90 | 33.0 | 110.0 | 8.9 | 35.6 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 2 | 52 | 81 | 26.0 | 64.2 | 6.2 | 60.5 | LOW |
| Scotland | ODI | 3 | 58 | 74 | 19.3 | 78.4 | 8.1 | 48.6 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 4 | 66 | 57 | 22.0 | 115.8 | 14.0 | 42.1 | LOW |
| Netherlands | ODI | 1 | 26 | 37 | 26.0 | 70.3 | 10.8 | 64.9 | LOW |
| United States of America | ODI | 1 | 24 | 36 | 24.0 | 66.7 | 5.6 | 55.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Scotland | ODI | 84 | 59 | 4 | 4.2 | 14.8 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 84 | 48 | 5 | 3.4 | 9.6 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 72 | 50 | 5 | 4.2 | 10.0 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 60 | 54 | 1 | 5.4 | 54.0 | LOW |
| Netherlands | ODI | 48 | 22 | 1 | 2.8 | 22.0 | LOW |
| Vanuatu | T20 | 48 | 42 | 2 | 5.3 | 21.0 | LOW |
| Samoa | T20 | 36 | 19 | 5 | 3.2 | 3.8 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 6 | 120 | 104 | 20.0 | 115.4 | 14.4 | 41.3 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 2 | 70 | 86 | 35.0 | 81.4 | 10.5 | 53.5 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 2 | 52 | 81 | 26.0 | 64.2 | 6.2 | 60.5 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 91 | 80 | 45.5 | 113.8 | 8.8 | 32.5 | LOW |
| ICC Academy, Dubai | ODI | 2 | 25 | 40 | 12.5 | 62.5 | 5.0 | 57.5 | LOW |
| Amini Park, Port Moresby | T20 | 6 | 43 | 37 | 8.6 | 116.2 | 16.2 | 43.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 168 | 114 | 14 | 4.1 | 8.1 | MEDIUM |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 78 | 52 | 1 | 4.0 | 52.0 | LOW |
| Amini Park, Port Moresby | T20 | 78 | 54 | 5 | 4.2 | 10.8 | LOW |
| Albert Park 1, Suva | T20 | 70 | 43 | 7 | 3.7 | 6.1 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 66 | 56 | 2 | 5.1 | 28.0 | LOW |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 60 | 46 | 3 | 4.6 | 15.3 | LOW |
| ICC Academy, Dubai | ODI | 36 | 20 | 3 | 3.3 | 6.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 27 | 272 | 235 | 11.8 | 115.7 | 14.9 | 42.1 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | ODI | 5 | 108 | 147 | 21.6 | 73.5 | 8.2 | 54.4 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 2 | 52 | 81 | 26.0 | 64.2 | 6.2 | 60.5 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 91 | 80 | 45.5 | 113.8 | 8.8 | 32.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 484 | 348 | 33 | 4.3 | 10.5 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 132 | 81 | 5 | 3.7 | 16.2 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | ODI | 7 | 152 | 210 | 25.3 | 72.4 | 8.1 | 56.2 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 20 | 162 | 172 | 16.2 | 94.2 | 8.7 | 44.8 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 16 | 189 | 131 | 15.8 | 144.3 | 19.1 | 31.3 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 336 | 237 | 16 | 4.2 | 14.8 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 114 | 75 | 2 | 3.9 | 37.5 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 100 | 66 | 16 | 4.0 | 4.1 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 48 | 45 | 1 | 5.6 | 45.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 23 | 214 | 186 | 16.5 | 115.1 | 13.4 | 39.8 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | ODI | 7 | 114 | 164 | 28.5 | 69.5 | 6.7 | 56.1 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 18 | 109 | 100 | 12.1 | 109.0 | 13.0 | 44.0 | LOW |
| PACE | ODI | 6 | 31 | 46 | 10.3 | 67.4 | 6.5 | 54.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.