PN Agarwal betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 12 | 144 | 166 | 18.0 | 86.7 | 7.2 | 45.2 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 8.0 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where PN Agarwal scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Belgium (T20)LOW sample
77 runs off 79 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 97.5 vs 86.7 overall, average 38.5 vs 18.0 overall.
- Venue: Pierre Werner Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
79 runs off 83 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 95.2 vs 86.7 overall, average 26.3 vs 18.0 overall.
- Venue: Banks Field, Vinor (T20)LOW sample
59 runs off 62 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 95.2 vs 86.7 overall, average 19.7 vs 18.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
47 runs off 65 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 72.3 vs 86.7 overall, average 9.4 vs 18.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Belgium | T20 | 3 | 77 | 79 | 38.5 | 97.5 | 6.3 | 35.4 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 3 | 50 | 52 | 25.0 | 96.2 | 11.5 | 44.2 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Pierre Werner Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 79 | 83 | 26.3 | 95.2 | 6.0 | 36.1 | LOW |
| Banks Field, Vinor | T20 | 4 | 59 | 62 | 19.7 | 95.2 | 11.3 | 46.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 12 | 144 | 166 | 18.0 | 86.7 | 7.2 | 45.2 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 5 | 54 | 66 | 27.0 | 81.8 | 6.1 | 42.4 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 7 | 47 | 65 | 9.4 | 72.3 | 6.2 | 55.4 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 3 | 43 | 35 | 43.0 | 122.9 | 11.4 | 31.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 12 | 100 | 117 | 14.3 | 85.5 | 6.0 | 44.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.