Pooja Ganesh betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 23 | 286 | 280 | 16.8 | 102.1 | 9.3 | 35.0 | MEDIUM |
| overall | ODI | 3 | 49 | 89 | 24.5 | 55.1 | 2.2 | 57.3 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Pooja Ganesh scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
111 runs off 97 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 114.4 vs 102.1 overall, average 13.9 vs 16.8 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
129 runs off 107 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 120.6 vs 102.1 overall, average 21.5 vs 16.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
117 runs off 132 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 88.6 vs 102.1 overall, average 13.0 vs 16.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 2 | 49 | 82 | 49.0 | 59.8 | 2.4 | 54.9 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 2 | 67 | 57 | 33.5 | 117.5 | 14.0 | 35.1 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 5 | 63 | 56 | 15.8 | 112.5 | 8.9 | 33.9 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 50 | 51 | 25.0 | 98.0 | 5.9 | 25.5 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 2 | 48 | 39 | 48.0 | 123.1 | 15.4 | 38.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas | ODI | 2 | 49 | 82 | 49.0 | 59.8 | 2.4 | 54.9 | LOW |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 4 | 77 | 75 | 25.7 | 102.7 | 9.3 | 34.7 | LOW |
| Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas | T20 | 3 | 50 | 51 | 25.0 | 98.0 | 5.9 | 25.5 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 4 | 48 | 50 | 16.0 | 96.0 | 4.0 | 32.0 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 48 | 42 | 24.0 | 114.3 | 7.1 | 21.4 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 23 | 286 | 280 | 16.8 | 102.1 | 9.3 | 35.0 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | ODI | 3 | 49 | 89 | 24.5 | 55.1 | 2.2 | 57.3 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 17 | 117 | 132 | 13.0 | 88.6 | 6.8 | 38.6 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 12 | 129 | 107 | 21.5 | 120.6 | 9.3 | 21.5 | LOW |
| middle | ODI | 2 | 49 | 80 | 49.0 | 61.3 | 2.5 | 53.8 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 6 | 40 | 41 | 20.0 | 97.6 | 17.1 | 58.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 21 | 161 | 168 | 17.9 | 95.8 | 6.5 | 32.1 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 15 | 111 | 97 | 13.9 | 114.4 | 14.4 | 41.2 | LOW |
| SPIN | ODI | 1 | 31 | 53 | 31.0 | 58.5 | 1.9 | 58.5 | LOW |
| PACE | ODI | 3 | 18 | 36 | 18.0 | 50.0 | 2.8 | 55.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.