R Immadi betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 23 | 234 | 294 | 14.6 | 79.6 | 5.1 | 47.6 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 489 | 516 | 18 | 6.3 | 28.7 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where R Immadi scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
105 runs off 104 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 101.0 vs 79.6 overall, average 21.0 vs 14.6 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
61 runs off 62 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 98.4 vs 79.6 overall, average 12.2 vs 14.6 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
102 runs off 152 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 67.1 vs 79.6 overall, average 11.3 vs 14.6 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Portugal | T20 | 3 | 22 | 38 | 11.0 | 57.9 | 0.0 | 44.7 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 2 | 29 | 36 | 14.5 | 80.6 | 2.8 | 38.9 | LOW |
| Bulgaria | T20 | 1 | 24 | 33 | — | 72.7 | 6.1 | 54.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| Portugal | T20 | 68 | 82 | 3 | 7.2 | 27.3 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 66 | 72 | 2 | 6.5 | 36.0 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 48 | 45 | 1 | 5.6 | 45.0 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 47 | 31 | 1 | 4.0 | 31.0 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 42 | 53 | 3 | 7.6 | 17.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 7 | 93 | 117 | 18.6 | 79.5 | 6.0 | 47.9 | LOW |
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 22 | 38 | 11.0 | 57.9 | 0.0 | 44.7 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club 2 | T20 | 1 | 29 | 34 | 29.0 | 85.3 | 2.9 | 35.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 137 | 117 | 6 | 5.1 | 19.5 | LOW |
| Ekeberg Cricket Ground 1, Oslo | T20 | 68 | 76 | 2 | 6.7 | 38.0 | LOW |
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 68 | 82 | 3 | 7.2 | 27.3 | LOW |
| Banks Field, Vinor | T20 | 66 | 82 | 3 | 7.5 | 27.3 | LOW |
| Albertslund Cricket Club | T20 | 42 | 53 | 1 | 7.6 | 53.0 | LOW |
| Ishoj Cricket Club, Vejledalen | T20 | 36 | 40 | 2 | 6.7 | 20.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 23 | 234 | 294 | 14.6 | 79.6 | 5.1 | 47.6 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 489 | 516 | 18 | 6.3 | 28.7 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 21 | 167 | 206 | 18.6 | 81.1 | 6.3 | 48.1 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 9 | 61 | 62 | 12.2 | 98.4 | 3.2 | 33.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 246 | 255 | 11 | 6.2 | 23.2 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 147 | 168 | 5 | 6.9 | 33.6 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 96 | 93 | 2 | 5.8 | 46.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 19 | 102 | 152 | 11.3 | 67.1 | 2.6 | 50.7 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 14 | 105 | 104 | 21.0 | 101.0 | 8.7 | 40.4 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 9 | 27 | 38 | 13.5 | 71.1 | 5.3 | 55.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.