R Poddar betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 22 | 216 | 271 | 12.7 | 79.7 | 6.6 | 48.0 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where R Poddar scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
104 runs off 120 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 86.7 vs 79.7 overall, average 26.0 vs 12.7 overall.
- Venue: Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda (T20)LOW sample
62 runs off 68 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 91.2 vs 79.7 overall, average 31.0 vs 12.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
No split is materially below their own format baseline.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Malaysia | T20 | 7 | 112 | 139 | 18.7 | 80.6 | 5.8 | 43.2 | MEDIUM |
| United States of America | T20 | 1 | 51 | 51 | — | 100.0 | 11.8 | 51.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 11 | 134 | 169 | 14.9 | 79.3 | 5.3 | 43.8 | MEDIUM |
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 4 | 62 | 68 | 31.0 | 91.2 | 11.8 | 54.4 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 22 | 216 | 271 | 12.7 | 79.7 | 6.6 | 48.0 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 8 | 86 | 117 | 17.2 | 73.5 | 4.3 | 47.0 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 16 | 83 | 114 | 9.2 | 72.8 | 7.9 | 55.3 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 6 | 47 | 40 | 15.7 | 117.5 | 10.0 | 30.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 15 | 104 | 120 | 26.0 | 86.7 | 8.3 | 47.5 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 18 | 88 | 118 | 8.8 | 74.6 | 5.9 | 48.3 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 6 | 24 | 33 | 8.0 | 72.7 | 3.0 | 48.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.