RA Herman betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 18 | 334 | 274 | 22.3 | 121.9 | 15.3 | 39.4 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where RA Herman scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
231 runs off 170 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 135.9 vs 121.9 overall, average 33.0 vs 22.3 overall.
- Opposition: Zimbabwe (T20)LOW sample
147 runs off 99 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 148.5 vs 121.9 overall, average 36.8 vs 22.3 overall.
- Venue: Harare Sports Club (T20)LOW sample
130 runs off 98 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 132.7 vs 121.9 overall, average 32.5 vs 22.3 overall.
- Venue: Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek (T20)LOW sample
100 runs off 74 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 135.1 vs 121.9 overall, average 20.0 vs 22.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: New Zealand (T20)LOW sample
119 runs off 107 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 111.2 vs 121.9 overall, average 19.8 vs 22.3 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
80 runs off 79 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 101.3 vs 121.9 overall, average 26.7 vs 22.3 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
64 runs off 69 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 92.8 vs 121.9 overall, average 32.0 vs 22.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| New Zealand | T20 | 8 | 119 | 107 | 19.8 | 111.2 | 14.0 | 43.9 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 5 | 147 | 99 | 36.8 | 148.5 | 19.2 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 3 | 61 | 48 | 20.3 | 127.1 | 16.7 | 35.4 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 5 | 130 | 98 | 32.5 | 132.7 | 16.3 | 39.8 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 6 | 100 | 74 | 20.0 | 135.1 | 18.9 | 35.1 | LOW |
| Hagley Oval, Christchurch | T20 | 1 | 39 | 31 | 39.0 | 125.8 | 16.1 | 38.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 13 | 204 | 176 | 18.5 | 115.9 | 14.8 | 39.2 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 5 | 130 | 98 | 32.5 | 132.7 | 16.3 | 39.8 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 14 | 231 | 170 | 33.0 | 135.9 | 15.9 | 30.0 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 10 | 64 | 69 | 32.0 | 92.8 | 14.5 | 62.3 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 7 | 39 | 35 | 6.5 | 111.4 | 14.3 | 40.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 17 | 209 | 167 | 17.4 | 125.1 | 16.8 | 41.9 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 14 | 80 | 79 | 26.7 | 101.3 | 8.9 | 36.7 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.