RA Mair betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 49 | 467 | 459 | 16.1 | 101.7 | 9.2 | 36.6 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 4 | 17 | 18 | 8.5 | 94.4 | 5.6 | 27.8 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 1663 | 1782 | 68 | 6.4 | 26.2 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 426 | 395 | 8 | 5.6 | 49.4 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where RA Mair scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
156 runs off 126 balls in 27 T20 matches — strike rate 123.8 vs 101.7 overall, average 26.0 vs 16.1 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
261 runs off 235 balls in 37 T20 matches — strike rate 111.1 vs 101.7 overall, average 13.1 vs 16.1 overall.
- Opposition: Auckland (T20)LOW sample
105 runs off 85 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 123.5 vs 101.7 overall, average 52.5 vs 16.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)HIGH sample
293 runs off 320 balls in 43 T20 matches — strike rate 91.6 vs 101.7 overall, average 13.3 vs 16.1 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
190 runs off 206 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 92.2 vs 101.7 overall, average 21.1 vs 16.1 overall.
- Opposition: Northern Districts (T20)LOW sample
63 runs off 68 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 92.6 vs 101.7 overall, average 10.5 vs 16.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Otago | T20 | 11 | 149 | 158 | 21.3 | 94.3 | 7.0 | 34.2 | MEDIUM |
| Wellington | T20 | 9 | 92 | 87 | 15.3 | 105.7 | 11.5 | 37.9 | LOW |
| Auckland | T20 | 6 | 105 | 85 | 52.5 | 123.5 | 12.9 | 34.1 | LOW |
| Northern Districts | T20 | 8 | 63 | 68 | 10.5 | 92.6 | 7.4 | 42.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Wellington | T20 | 258 | 265 | 13 | 6.2 | 20.4 | MEDIUM |
| Australia | ODI | 252 | 245 | 4 | 5.8 | 61.3 | MEDIUM |
| Otago | T20 | 240 | 226 | 7 | 5.7 | 32.3 | MEDIUM |
| Northern Districts | T20 | 213 | 226 | 17 | 6.4 | 13.3 | MEDIUM |
| Auckland | T20 | 189 | 230 | 8 | 7.3 | 28.8 | MEDIUM |
| England | T20 | 151 | 188 | 4 | 7.5 | 47.0 | MEDIUM |
| India | ODI | 126 | 121 | 3 | 5.8 | 40.3 | LOW |
| Canterbury | T20 | 123 | 125 | 3 | 6.1 | 41.7 | LOW |
| South Africa | T20 | 114 | 149 | 4 | 7.8 | 37.3 | LOW |
| Australia | T20 | 99 | 121 | 3 | 7.3 | 40.3 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | T20 | 78 | 84 | 1 | 6.5 | 84.0 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 60 | 38 | 1 | 3.8 | 38.0 | LOW |
| Pakistan | ODI | 48 | 29 | 1 | 3.6 | 29.0 | LOW |
| West Indies | T20 | 48 | 43 | 0 | 5.4 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Saxton Oval, Nelson | T20 | 5 | 59 | 57 | 29.5 | 103.5 | 8.8 | 35.1 | LOW |
| Basin Reserve, Wellington | T20 | 5 | 48 | 48 | 24.0 | 100.0 | 10.4 | 37.5 | LOW |
| Pukekura Park, New Plymouth | T20 | 6 | 41 | 48 | 10.3 | 85.4 | 6.3 | 43.8 | LOW |
| University Oval, Dunedin | T20 | 2 | 39 | 40 | 19.5 | 97.5 | 10.0 | 40.0 | LOW |
| McLean Park, Napier | T20 | 4 | 34 | 38 | 34.0 | 89.5 | 5.3 | 28.9 | LOW |
| Molyneux Park, Alexandra | T20 | 2 | 38 | 36 | 19.0 | 105.6 | 11.1 | 36.1 | LOW |
| Eden Park Outer Oval | T20 | 1 | 36 | 35 | — | 102.9 | 5.7 | 37.1 | LOW |
| Eden Park, Auckland | T20 | 1 | 34 | 31 | 34.0 | 109.7 | 12.9 | 48.4 | LOW |
| Fitzherbert Park, Palmerston North | T20 | 5 | 43 | 31 | 14.3 | 138.7 | 16.1 | 22.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Basin Reserve, Wellington | T20 | 143 | 160 | 6 | 6.7 | 26.7 | LOW |
| Saxton Oval, Nelson | T20 | 138 | 157 | 5 | 6.8 | 31.4 | LOW |
| Seddon Park, Hamilton | T20 | 131 | 101 | 7 | 4.6 | 14.4 | LOW |
| Pukekura Park, New Plymouth | T20 | 129 | 125 | 6 | 5.8 | 20.8 | LOW |
| John Davies Oval, Queenstown | ODI | 126 | 121 | 3 | 5.8 | 40.3 | LOW |
| McLean Park, Napier | T20 | 124 | 128 | 9 | 6.2 | 14.2 | LOW |
| Basin Reserve, Wellington | ODI | 120 | 114 | 4 | 5.7 | 28.5 | LOW |
| Fitzherbert Park, Palmerston North | T20 | 120 | 135 | 3 | 6.8 | 45.0 | LOW |
| Bay Oval, Mount Maunganui | ODI | 84 | 99 | 0 | 7.1 | — | LOW |
| Eden Park, Auckland | T20 | 78 | 75 | 6 | 5.8 | 12.5 | LOW |
| Hagley Oval, Christchurch | T20 | 72 | 83 | 2 | 6.9 | 41.5 | LOW |
| Sharjah Cricket Stadium | T20 | 72 | 55 | 2 | 4.6 | 27.5 | LOW |
| The Rose Bowl, Southampton | T20 | 72 | 86 | 1 | 7.2 | 86.0 | LOW |
| Dubai International Cricket Stadium | T20 | 66 | 62 | 8 | 5.6 | 7.8 | LOW |
| University Oval, Dunedin | T20 | 66 | 67 | 0 | 6.1 | — | LOW |
| Bay Oval, Mount Maunganui | T20 | 60 | 85 | 3 | 8.5 | 28.3 | LOW |
| Eden Park Outer Oval, Auckland | T20 | 60 | 82 | 2 | 8.2 | 41.0 | LOW |
| Bay Oval | ODI | 48 | 32 | 0 | 4.0 | — | LOW |
| Hagley Oval, Christchurch | ODI | 48 | 29 | 1 | 3.6 | 29.0 | LOW |
| Molyneux Park, Alexandra | T20 | 48 | 43 | 2 | 5.4 | 21.5 | LOW |
| Pukekura Park | T20 | 48 | 58 | 1 | 7.3 | 58.0 | LOW |
| Sky Stadium, Wellington | T20 | 48 | 73 | 1 | 9.1 | 73.0 | LOW |
| McLean Park | T20 | 42 | 59 | 0 | 8.4 | — | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 47 | 463 | 454 | 17.1 | 102.0 | 9.3 | 36.3 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 1591 | 1727 | 66 | 6.5 | 26.2 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 426 | 395 | 8 | 5.6 | 49.4 | HIGH |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 72 | 55 | 2 | 4.6 | 27.5 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| death | T20 | 37 | 261 | 235 | 13.1 | 111.1 | 10.2 | 30.6 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 26 | 190 | 206 | 21.1 | 92.2 | 8.7 | 42.7 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 750 | 707 | 22 | 5.7 | 32.1 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 465 | 494 | 13 | 6.4 | 38.0 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 448 | 581 | 33 | 7.8 | 17.6 | HIGH |
| middle | ODI | 234 | 210 | 7 | 5.4 | 30.0 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | ODI | 138 | 123 | 0 | 5.3 | — | LOW |
| death | ODI | 54 | 62 | 1 | 6.9 | 62.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 43 | 293 | 320 | 13.3 | 91.6 | 6.6 | 36.9 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 27 | 156 | 126 | 26.0 | 123.8 | 15.1 | 37.3 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.