Rinitha Rajith betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 44 | 465 | 436 | 14.1 | 106.7 | 14.4 | 44.5 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 3.5 | 7.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Rinitha Rajith scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
128 runs off 78 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 164.1 vs 106.7 overall, average 128.0 vs 14.1 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
155 runs off 119 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 130.3 vs 106.7 overall, average 17.2 vs 14.1 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
133 runs off 116 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 114.7 vs 106.7 overall, average 13.3 vs 14.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)MEDIUM sample
118 runs off 129 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 91.5 vs 106.7 overall, average 13.1 vs 14.1 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
193 runs off 226 balls in 37 T20 matches — strike rate 85.4 vs 106.7 overall, average 12.9 vs 14.1 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
177 runs off 201 balls in 24 T20 matches — strike rate 88.1 vs 106.7 overall, average 12.6 vs 14.1 overall.
- Venue: Dubai International Cricket Stadium (T20)LOW sample
80 runs off 116 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 69.0 vs 106.7 overall, average 11.4 vs 14.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Namibia | T20 | 11 | 118 | 129 | 13.1 | 91.5 | 10.9 | 48.1 | MEDIUM |
| Qatar | T20 | 3 | 103 | 58 | 51.5 | 177.6 | 29.3 | 25.9 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 4 | 39 | 41 | 19.5 | 95.1 | 17.1 | 61.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Dubai International Cricket Stadium | T20 | 8 | 80 | 116 | 11.4 | 69.0 | 5.2 | 51.7 | LOW |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | T20 | 1 | 96 | 51 | 96.0 | 188.2 | 31.4 | 23.5 | LOW |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 3 | 37 | 49 | 18.5 | 75.5 | 8.2 | 49.0 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 6 | 44 | 40 | 7.3 | 110.0 | 22.5 | 62.5 | LOW |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 30 | 37 | 15.0 | 81.1 | 10.8 | 56.8 | LOW |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 3 | 42 | 34 | 42.0 | 123.5 | 17.6 | 35.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 44 | 465 | 436 | 14.1 | 106.7 | 14.4 | 44.5 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 24 | 177 | 201 | 12.6 | 88.1 | 10.4 | 50.7 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 16 | 155 | 119 | 17.2 | 130.3 | 16.8 | 30.3 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 20 | 133 | 116 | 13.3 | 114.7 | 19.0 | 48.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 37 | 193 | 226 | 12.9 | 85.4 | 8.8 | 47.3 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 29 | 144 | 132 | 8.5 | 109.1 | 17.4 | 49.2 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 128 | 78 | 128.0 | 164.1 | 25.6 | 28.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.