Ritik Tomar betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 28 | 336 | 319 | 14.0 | 105.3 | 11.3 | 42.9 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 222 | 331 | 9 | 8.9 | 36.8 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where Ritik Tomar scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
92 runs off 73 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 126.0 vs 105.3 overall, average 18.4 vs 14.0 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
132 runs off 82 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 161.0 vs 105.3 overall, average 14.7 vs 14.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
170 runs off 183 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 92.9 vs 105.3 overall, average 18.9 vs 14.0 overall.
- Venue: Tikkurila Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
52 runs off 66 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 78.8 vs 105.3 overall, average 10.4 vs 14.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Greece | T20 | 2 | 52 | 55 | 26.0 | 94.5 | 7.3 | 40.0 | LOW |
| Bulgaria | T20 | 3 | 33 | 38 | 16.5 | 86.8 | 5.3 | 44.7 | LOW |
| Hungary | T20 | 2 | 60 | 30 | 60.0 | 200.0 | 23.3 | 13.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Hungary | T20 | 36 | 75 | 1 | 12.5 | 75.0 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 36 | 56 | 1 | 9.3 | 56.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 52 | 66 | 10.4 | 78.8 | 6.1 | 48.5 | LOW |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 6 | 108 | 58 | 36.0 | 186.2 | 24.1 | 24.1 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 9 | 59 | 58 | 7.4 | 101.7 | 12.1 | 44.8 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 2 | 52 | 54 | 26.0 | 96.3 | 11.1 | 46.3 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 39 | 46 | 13.0 | 84.8 | 4.3 | 43.5 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 3 | 26 | 37 | 8.7 | 70.3 | 8.1 | 54.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 108 | 163 | 5 | 9.1 | 32.6 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 60 | 68 | 3 | 6.8 | 22.7 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 48 | 88 | 1 | 11.0 | 88.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 28 | 336 | 319 | 14.0 | 105.3 | 11.3 | 42.9 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 222 | 331 | 9 | 8.9 | 36.8 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 17 | 170 | 183 | 18.9 | 92.9 | 9.3 | 44.8 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 13 | 132 | 82 | 14.7 | 161.0 | 19.5 | 30.5 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 9 | 34 | 54 | 5.7 | 63.0 | 5.6 | 55.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 108 | 150 | 3 | 8.3 | 50.0 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 84 | 129 | 6 | 9.2 | 21.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 23 | 129 | 132 | 10.8 | 97.7 | 9.8 | 43.9 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 17 | 115 | 114 | 16.4 | 100.9 | 11.4 | 46.5 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 92 | 73 | 18.4 | 126.0 | 13.7 | 35.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.