RJ Ainsworth betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 10 | 124 | 132 | 24.8 | 93.9 | 9.8 | 49.2 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 42 | 95 | 2 | 13.6 | 47.5 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where RJ Ainsworth scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Austria (T20)LOW sample
78 runs off 62 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 125.8 vs 93.9 overall, not yet dismissed vs 24.8 overall.
- Venue: GB Oval, Szodliget (T20)LOW sample
78 runs off 66 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 118.2 vs 93.9 overall, average 78.0 vs 24.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
77 runs off 92 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 83.7 vs 93.9 overall, average 38.5 vs 24.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Austria | T20 | 3 | 78 | 62 | — | 125.8 | 16.1 | 38.7 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 1 | 27 | 42 | 27.0 | 64.3 | 4.8 | 57.1 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| GB Oval, Szodliget | T20 | 4 | 78 | 66 | 78.0 | 118.2 | 15.2 | 42.4 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 3 | 42 | 59 | 21.0 | 71.2 | 5.1 | 55.9 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 10 | 124 | 132 | 24.8 | 93.9 | 9.8 | 49.2 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 42 | 95 | 2 | 13.6 | 47.5 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 6 | 77 | 92 | 38.5 | 83.7 | 8.7 | 55.4 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 8 | 47 | 40 | 15.7 | 117.5 | 12.5 | 35.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 5 | 54 | 57 | 27.0 | 94.7 | 10.5 | 52.6 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 6 | 31 | 43 | 31.0 | 72.1 | 7.0 | 48.8 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 7 | 39 | 32 | 19.5 | 121.9 | 12.5 | 43.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.