RM Magare betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 13 | 162 | 144 | 14.7 | 112.5 | 14.6 | 36.8 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 156 | 213 | 5 | 8.2 | 42.6 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where RM Magare scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
90 runs off 74 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 121.6 vs 112.5 overall, average 18.0 vs 14.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
No split is materially below their own format baseline.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Romania | T20 | 4 | 40 | 45 | 13.3 | 88.9 | 8.9 | 42.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| Romania | T20 | 90 | 99 | 2 | 6.6 | 49.5 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 36 | 60 | 2 | 10.0 | 30.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 6 | 59 | 56 | 11.8 | 105.4 | 12.5 | 35.7 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 4 | 40 | 45 | 13.3 | 88.9 | 8.9 | 42.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 90 | 99 | 2 | 6.6 | 49.5 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 42 | 71 | 2 | 10.1 | 35.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 13 | 162 | 144 | 14.7 | 112.5 | 14.6 | 36.8 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 156 | 213 | 5 | 8.2 | 42.6 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 8 | 90 | 74 | 18.0 | 121.6 | 18.9 | 40.5 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 6 | 68 | 62 | 13.6 | 109.7 | 11.3 | 32.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 114 | 156 | 5 | 8.2 | 31.2 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 36 | 49 | 0 | 8.2 | — | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 13 | 104 | 95 | 17.3 | 109.5 | 15.8 | 41.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.