RMR Brathwaite betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 7 | 36 | 40 | 7.2 | 90.0 | 7.5 | 37.5 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 77 | 129 | 3 | 10.1 | 43.0 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
Bowling
| Finland | T20 | 36 | 76 | 1 | 12.7 | 76.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 5 | 21 | 30 | 7.0 | 70.0 | 3.3 | 40.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 65 | 117 | 3 | 10.8 | 39.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 7 | 36 | 40 | 7.2 | 90.0 | 7.5 | 37.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 77 | 129 | 3 | 10.1 | 43.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 65 | 97 | 3 | 9.0 | 32.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.