RP Burl betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 83 | 1589 | 1242 | 28.4 | 127.9 | 14.7 | 34.9 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 26 | 610 | 706 | 27.7 | 86.4 | 9.9 | 53.8 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 677 | 818 | 33 | 7.2 | 24.8 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 438 | 491 | 11 | 6.7 | 44.6 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where RP Burl scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (ODI)HIGH sample
299 runs off 356 balls in 23 ODI matches — strike rate 84.0 vs 86.4 overall, average 42.7 vs 27.7 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)HIGH sample
602 runs off 391 balls in 48 T20 matches — strike rate 154.0 vs 127.9 overall, average 25.1 vs 28.4 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)MEDIUM sample
291 runs off 215 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 135.3 vs 127.9 overall, average 48.5 vs 28.4 overall.
- Opposition: Ireland (ODI)MEDIUM sample
143 runs off 187 balls in 5 ODI matches — strike rate 76.5 vs 86.4 overall, average 35.8 vs 27.7 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
234 runs off 163 balls in 30 T20 matches — strike rate 143.6 vs 127.9 overall, average 33.4 vs 28.4 overall.
- Opposition: Scotland (ODI)LOW sample
83 runs off 84 balls in 1 ODI match — strike rate 98.8 vs 86.4 overall, average 83.0 vs 27.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
896 runs off 779 balls in 70 T20 matches — strike rate 115.0 vs 127.9 overall, average 29.9 vs 28.4 overall.
- Phase: middle (ODI)HIGH sample
462 runs off 600 balls in 22 ODI matches — strike rate 77.0 vs 86.4 overall, average 28.9 vs 27.7 overall.
- Opposition: Sri Lanka (ODI)MEDIUM sample
94 runs off 130 balls in 6 ODI matches — strike rate 72.3 vs 86.4 overall, average 18.8 vs 27.7 overall.
- Opposition: India (T20)MEDIUM sample
135 runs off 120 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 112.5 vs 127.9 overall, average 33.8 vs 28.4 overall.
- Opposition: Pakistan (T20)LOW sample
95 runs off 90 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 105.6 vs 127.9 overall, average 23.8 vs 28.4 overall.
- Opposition: India (ODI)LOW sample
58 runs off 81 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 71.6 vs 86.4 overall, average 29.0 vs 27.7 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Namibia | T20 | 14 | 291 | 215 | 48.5 | 135.3 | 15.3 | 32.1 | MEDIUM |
| Ireland | ODI | 5 | 143 | 187 | 35.8 | 76.5 | 8.6 | 55.6 | MEDIUM |
| Ireland | T20 | 10 | 220 | 167 | 27.5 | 131.7 | 14.4 | 32.9 | MEDIUM |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 8 | 198 | 155 | 33.0 | 127.7 | 14.2 | 36.1 | MEDIUM |
| Sri Lanka | ODI | 6 | 94 | 130 | 18.8 | 72.3 | 6.9 | 59.2 | MEDIUM |
| India | T20 | 5 | 135 | 120 | 33.8 | 112.5 | 12.5 | 37.5 | MEDIUM |
| Sri Lanka | T20 | 8 | 159 | 117 | 26.5 | 135.9 | 16.2 | 32.5 | LOW |
| Pakistan | T20 | 6 | 95 | 90 | 23.8 | 105.6 | 13.3 | 46.7 | LOW |
| Scotland | ODI | 1 | 83 | 84 | 83.0 | 98.8 | 10.7 | 45.2 | LOW |
| India | ODI | 3 | 58 | 81 | 29.0 | 71.6 | 7.4 | 55.6 | LOW |
| South Africa | T20 | 6 | 88 | 75 | 17.6 | 117.3 | 12.0 | 32.0 | LOW |
| Kenya | T20 | 3 | 86 | 66 | 86.0 | 130.3 | 13.6 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | ODI | 2 | 65 | 60 | 32.5 | 108.3 | 15.0 | 48.3 | LOW |
| West Indies | ODI | 1 | 50 | 57 | 50.0 | 87.7 | 10.5 | 52.6 | LOW |
| Australia | ODI | 3 | 23 | 40 | 7.7 | 57.5 | 10.0 | 77.5 | LOW |
| Netherlands | ODI | 3 | 34 | 39 | 17.0 | 87.2 | 7.7 | 48.7 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 2 | 63 | 31 | 63.0 | 203.2 | 32.3 | 29.0 | LOW |
| Australia | T20 | 1 | 35 | 30 | 35.0 | 116.7 | 13.3 | 30.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Namibia | T20 | 120 | 160 | 5 | 8.0 | 32.0 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 108 | 136 | 7 | 7.6 | 19.4 | LOW |
| Ireland | ODI | 98 | 97 | 1 | 5.9 | 97.0 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | ODI | 98 | 122 | 1 | 7.5 | 122.0 | LOW |
| Netherlands | ODI | 84 | 93 | 0 | 6.6 | — | LOW |
| Australia | ODI | 60 | 70 | 8 | 7.0 | 8.8 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | ODI | 55 | 64 | 0 | 7.0 | — | LOW |
| Pakistan | T20 | 48 | 60 | 2 | 7.5 | 30.0 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 48 | 25 | 3 | 3.1 | 8.3 | LOW |
| Tanzania | T20 | 40 | 35 | 2 | 5.3 | 17.5 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 36 | 61 | 0 | 10.2 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 26 | 628 | 484 | 33.1 | 129.8 | 14.5 | 32.9 | HIGH |
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 14 | 392 | 430 | 35.6 | 91.2 | 10.9 | 52.1 | HIGH |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | T20 | 16 | 222 | 168 | 24.7 | 132.1 | 13.7 | 31.5 | MEDIUM |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | ODI | 3 | 112 | 111 | 37.3 | 100.9 | 10.8 | 47.7 | LOW |
| Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium | T20 | 4 | 130 | 93 | 65.0 | 139.8 | 20.4 | 41.9 | LOW |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 6 | 78 | 81 | 26.0 | 96.3 | 7.4 | 39.5 | LOW |
| Pallekele International Cricket Stadium | ODI | 3 | 38 | 65 | 19.0 | 58.5 | 6.2 | 63.1 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 5 | 87 | 61 | 29.0 | 142.6 | 18.0 | 29.5 | LOW |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 4 | 92 | 61 | 46.0 | 150.8 | 21.3 | 34.4 | LOW |
| R Premadasa Stadium, Colombo | T20 | 4 | 76 | 59 | 19.0 | 128.8 | 15.3 | 32.2 | LOW |
| Gymkhana Club Ground, Nairobi | T20 | 2 | 84 | 54 | 42.0 | 155.6 | 16.7 | 27.8 | LOW |
| R Premadasa Stadium, Colombo | ODI | 2 | 40 | 50 | 20.0 | 80.0 | 6.0 | 52.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 266 | 285 | 2 | 6.4 | 142.5 | MEDIUM |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 202 | 265 | 11 | 7.9 | 24.1 | MEDIUM |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | T20 | 175 | 226 | 7 | 7.7 | 32.3 | MEDIUM |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 126 | 108 | 7 | 5.1 | 15.4 | LOW |
| Pallekele International Cricket Stadium | ODI | 54 | 52 | 1 | 5.8 | 52.0 | LOW |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 54 | 50 | 3 | 5.6 | 16.7 | LOW |
| Tony Ireland Stadium, Townsville | ODI | 42 | 60 | 3 | 8.6 | 20.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 52 | 810 | 640 | 23.1 | 126.6 | 14.4 | 34.8 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 26 | 628 | 484 | 33.1 | 129.8 | 14.5 | 32.9 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 14 | 392 | 430 | 35.6 | 91.2 | 10.9 | 52.1 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 12 | 218 | 276 | 19.8 | 79.0 | 8.3 | 56.5 | MEDIUM |
| Pakistan | T20 | 4 | 130 | 93 | 65.0 | 139.8 | 20.4 | 41.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 463 | 534 | 21 | 6.9 | 25.4 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 266 | 285 | 2 | 6.4 | 142.5 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 202 | 265 | 11 | 7.9 | 24.1 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | ODI | 172 | 206 | 9 | 7.2 | 22.9 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 70 | 896 | 779 | 29.9 | 115.0 | 12.3 | 37.9 | HIGH |
| middle | ODI | 22 | 462 | 600 | 28.9 | 77.0 | 8.3 | 55.8 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 48 | 602 | 391 | 25.1 | 154.0 | 18.9 | 27.9 | HIGH |
| death | ODI | 8 | 144 | 82 | 24.0 | 175.6 | 24.4 | 29.3 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 14 | 91 | 72 | 45.5 | 126.4 | 18.1 | 41.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 589 | 711 | 28 | 7.2 | 25.4 | HIGH |
| middle | ODI | 406 | 437 | 11 | 6.5 | 39.7 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 88 | 107 | 5 | 7.3 | 21.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 72 | 739 | 592 | 24.6 | 124.8 | 14.0 | 34.1 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 66 | 616 | 487 | 32.4 | 126.5 | 14.4 | 35.1 | HIGH |
| SPIN | ODI | 23 | 299 | 356 | 42.7 | 84.0 | 8.4 | 52.2 | HIGH |
| PACE | ODI | 22 | 284 | 327 | 20.3 | 86.9 | 11.6 | 56.6 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 30 | 234 | 163 | 33.4 | 143.6 | 18.4 | 37.4 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.