S Etim betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 26 | 187 | 260 | 9.3 | 71.9 | 5.8 | 56.9 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where S Etim scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Rwanda (T20)LOW sample
52 runs off 62 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 83.9 vs 71.9 overall, average 10.4 vs 9.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
No split is materially below their own format baseline.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Rwanda | T20 | 6 | 52 | 62 | 10.4 | 83.9 | 4.8 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Brazil | T20 | 3 | 32 | 38 | 16.0 | 84.2 | 5.3 | 42.1 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 2 | 26 | 31 | 13.0 | 83.9 | 16.1 | 64.5 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 3 | 19 | 30 | 19.0 | 63.3 | 3.3 | 46.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 9 | 85 | 114 | 14.2 | 74.6 | 6.1 | 54.4 | LOW |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 7 | 51 | 56 | 8.5 | 91.1 | 3.6 | 48.2 | LOW |
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 2 | 26 | 32 | 13.0 | 81.3 | 15.6 | 65.6 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 26 | 187 | 260 | 9.3 | 71.9 | 5.8 | 56.9 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 21 | 127 | 176 | 11.5 | 72.2 | 6.3 | 58.0 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 11 | 57 | 73 | 8.1 | 78.1 | 5.5 | 52.1 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 21 | 146 | 188 | 12.2 | 77.7 | 6.4 | 55.3 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 9 | 24 | 48 | 6.0 | 50.0 | 2.1 | 62.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.