S Jimmy betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 16 | 212 | 233 | 14.1 | 91.0 | 12.4 | 53.2 | MEDIUM |
| overall | ODI | 8 | 118 | 189 | 14.8 | 62.4 | 6.3 | 61.4 | MEDIUM |
| overall | ODI | 386 | 220 | 14 | 3.4 | 15.7 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 340 | 337 | 22 | 5.9 | 15.3 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where S Jimmy scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (ODI)MEDIUM sample
101 runs off 133 balls in 7 ODI matches — strike rate 75.9 vs 62.4 overall, average 20.2 vs 14.8 overall.
- Venue: Tolerance Oval, Abu Dhabi (T20)LOW sample
93 runs off 91 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 102.2 vs 91.0 overall, average 23.3 vs 14.1 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
102 runs off 91 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 112.1 vs 91.0 overall, average 14.6 vs 14.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
87 runs off 129 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 67.4 vs 91.0 overall, average 14.5 vs 14.1 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
68 runs off 88 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 77.3 vs 91.0 overall, average 11.3 vs 14.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 2 | 74 | 112 | 37.0 | 66.1 | 6.3 | 59.8 | LOW |
| Scotland | ODI | 3 | 17 | 40 | 5.7 | 42.5 | 2.5 | 62.5 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 2 | 43 | 40 | 21.5 | 107.5 | 20.0 | 57.5 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 4 | 21 | 35 | 5.3 | 60.0 | 2.9 | 57.1 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 1 | 32 | 34 | 32.0 | 94.1 | 14.7 | 64.7 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 2 | 32 | 32 | 32.0 | 100.0 | 15.6 | 40.6 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 1 | 28 | 30 | 28.0 | 93.3 | 10.0 | 43.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Scotland | ODI | 134 | 90 | 7 | 4.0 | 12.9 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 112 | 57 | 5 | 3.1 | 11.4 | LOW |
| Netherlands | ODI | 96 | 55 | 1 | 3.4 | 55.0 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 88 | 84 | 3 | 5.7 | 28.0 | LOW |
| United States of America | ODI | 44 | 18 | 1 | 2.5 | 18.0 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 42 | 49 | 4 | 7.0 | 12.3 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 42 | 39 | 0 | 5.6 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 2 | 74 | 112 | 37.0 | 66.1 | 6.3 | 59.8 | LOW |
| Tolerance Oval, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 4 | 93 | 91 | 23.3 | 102.2 | 16.5 | 57.1 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 40 | 38 | 13.3 | 105.3 | 13.2 | 42.1 | LOW |
| ICC Academy, Dubai | ODI | 2 | 14 | 30 | 7.0 | 46.7 | 3.3 | 66.7 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 19 | 30 | 6.3 | 63.3 | 3.3 | 53.3 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 1 | 28 | 30 | 28.0 | 93.3 | 10.0 | 43.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 112 | 57 | 5 | 3.1 | 11.4 | LOW |
| ICC Academy, Dubai | ODI | 104 | 56 | 4 | 3.2 | 14.0 | LOW |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 92 | 52 | 4 | 3.4 | 13.0 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 78 | 55 | 1 | 4.2 | 55.0 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 76 | 79 | 3 | 6.2 | 26.3 | LOW |
| Vanuatu Cricket Ground | T20 | 60 | 39 | 7 | 3.9 | 5.6 | LOW |
| Tolerance Oval, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 54 | 47 | 4 | 5.2 | 11.8 | LOW |
| Amini Park, Port Moresby | T20 | 42 | 39 | 0 | 5.6 | — | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 42 | 67 | 3 | 9.6 | 22.3 | LOW |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | T20 | 36 | 36 | 3 | 6.0 | 12.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 13 | 193 | 203 | 16.1 | 95.1 | 13.8 | 53.2 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 2 | 74 | 112 | 37.0 | 66.1 | 6.3 | 59.8 | LOW |
| Unknown | ODI | 6 | 44 | 77 | 7.3 | 57.1 | 6.5 | 63.6 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 19 | 30 | 6.3 | 63.3 | 3.3 | 53.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | ODI | 274 | 163 | 9 | 3.6 | 18.1 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | T20 | 264 | 258 | 19 | 5.9 | 13.6 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 112 | 57 | 5 | 3.1 | 11.4 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 76 | 79 | 3 | 6.2 | 26.3 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | ODI | 7 | 107 | 158 | 15.3 | 67.7 | 7.0 | 57.6 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 12 | 87 | 129 | 14.5 | 67.4 | 8.5 | 61.2 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 9 | 102 | 91 | 14.6 | 112.1 | 15.4 | 46.2 | LOW |
| powerplay | ODI | 3 | 11 | 31 | 11.0 | 35.5 | 3.2 | 80.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | ODI | 218 | 141 | 8 | 3.9 | 17.6 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 162 | 173 | 9 | 6.4 | 19.2 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | ODI | 144 | 70 | 2 | 2.9 | 35.0 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 126 | 100 | 9 | 4.8 | 11.1 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 52 | 64 | 4 | 7.4 | 16.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | ODI | 7 | 101 | 133 | 20.2 | 75.9 | 8.3 | 55.6 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 11 | 128 | 130 | 16.0 | 98.5 | 13.8 | 53.1 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 12 | 68 | 88 | 11.3 | 77.3 | 9.1 | 52.3 | LOW |
| PACE | ODI | 4 | 12 | 40 | 12.0 | 30.0 | 2.5 | 75.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.