S Mtae betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 45 | 804 | 754 | 19.6 | 106.6 | 14.2 | 45.4 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 78 | 65 | 3 | 5.0 | 21.7 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where S Mtae scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)LOW sample
140 runs off 109 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 128.4 vs 106.6 overall, average 35.0 vs 19.6 overall.
- Opposition: Hong Kong (T20)LOW sample
116 runs off 83 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 139.8 vs 106.6 overall, average 23.2 vs 19.6 overall.
- Venue: Gymkhana Club Ground, Nairobi (T20)LOW sample
86 runs off 64 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 134.4 vs 106.6 overall, average 28.7 vs 19.6 overall.
- Venue: Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek (T20)LOW sample
83 runs off 61 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 136.1 vs 106.6 overall, average 20.8 vs 19.6 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
95 runs off 72 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 131.9 vs 106.6 overall, average 19.0 vs 19.6 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)HIGH sample
323 runs off 332 balls in 29 T20 matches — strike rate 97.3 vs 106.6 overall, average 14.7 vs 19.6 overall.
- Opposition: Uganda (T20)MEDIUM sample
152 runs off 166 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 91.6 vs 106.6 overall, average 21.7 vs 19.6 overall.
- Venue: Entebbe Cricket Oval (T20)LOW sample
77 runs off 95 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 81.1 vs 106.6 overall, average 25.7 vs 19.6 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Uganda | T20 | 7 | 152 | 166 | 21.7 | 91.6 | 9.0 | 44.0 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia | T20 | 5 | 140 | 109 | 35.0 | 128.4 | 17.4 | 39.4 | LOW |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 5 | 116 | 83 | 23.2 | 139.8 | 25.3 | 47.0 | LOW |
| Kenya | T20 | 4 | 62 | 58 | 15.5 | 106.9 | 15.5 | 46.6 | LOW |
| Botswana | T20 | 2 | 43 | 44 | 43.0 | 97.7 | 9.1 | 40.9 | LOW |
| Qatar | T20 | 2 | 63 | 40 | 31.5 | 157.5 | 22.5 | 35.0 | LOW |
| Japan | T20 | 1 | 36 | 32 | 36.0 | 112.5 | 12.5 | 34.4 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 6 | 157 | 137 | 26.2 | 114.6 | 19.0 | 49.6 | MEDIUM |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 4 | 77 | 95 | 25.7 | 81.1 | 6.3 | 47.4 | LOW |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 4 | 86 | 81 | 28.7 | 106.2 | 13.6 | 42.0 | LOW |
| Hong Kong Cricket Club | T20 | 4 | 88 | 81 | 22.0 | 108.6 | 13.6 | 40.7 | LOW |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 6 | 89 | 79 | 14.8 | 112.7 | 16.5 | 48.1 | LOW |
| Gymkhana Club Ground, Nairobi | T20 | 3 | 86 | 64 | 28.7 | 134.4 | 17.2 | 34.4 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 5 | 83 | 61 | 20.8 | 136.1 | 24.6 | 47.5 | LOW |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School A Field, Accra | T20 | 2 | 50 | 47 | 25.0 | 106.4 | 8.5 | 40.4 | LOW |
| Integrated Polytechnic Regional Centre | T20 | 2 | 31 | 31 | 15.5 | 100.0 | 6.5 | 32.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 45 | 804 | 754 | 19.6 | 106.6 | 14.2 | 45.4 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 78 | 65 | 3 | 5.0 | 21.7 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 43 | 558 | 525 | 23.3 | 106.3 | 15.2 | 48.8 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 19 | 215 | 210 | 13.4 | 102.4 | 10.5 | 39.0 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 54 | 32 | 1 | 3.6 | 32.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 36 | 386 | 350 | 27.6 | 110.3 | 16.6 | 47.7 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 29 | 323 | 332 | 14.7 | 97.3 | 11.1 | 45.2 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 15 | 95 | 72 | 19.0 | 131.9 | 16.7 | 34.7 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.