S Paldon betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 7 | 35 | 79 | 7.0 | 44.3 | 2.5 | 63.3 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Hong Kong | T20 | 3 | 32 | 58 | 16.0 | 55.2 | 3.4 | 56.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Gelephu International Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 33 | 73 | 8.3 | 45.2 | 2.7 | 63.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 7 | 35 | 79 | 7.0 | 44.3 | 2.5 | 63.3 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 3 | 17 | 40 | 8.5 | 42.5 | 2.5 | 65.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 4 | 9 | 30 | 3.0 | 30.0 | 0.0 | 73.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.