S Raveendrakumar betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 7 | 77 | 108 | 19.3 | 71.3 | 3.7 | 54.6 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Luxembourg | T20 | 2 | 26 | 42 | — | 61.9 | 2.4 | 57.1 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 3 | 50 | 61 | 16.7 | 82.0 | 4.9 | 50.8 | LOW |
| Banks Field, Vinor | T20 | 4 | 27 | 47 | 27.0 | 57.4 | 2.1 | 59.6 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 7 | 77 | 108 | 19.3 | 71.3 | 3.7 | 54.6 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 6 | 54 | 68 | 18.0 | 79.4 | 4.4 | 54.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 6 | 26 | 52 | 13.0 | 50.0 | 3.8 | 61.5 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 4 | 40 | 46 | 40.0 | 87.0 | 4.3 | 52.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.