S Singh betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 47 | 677 | 667 | 17.4 | 101.5 | 12.1 | 46.5 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where S Singh scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
371 runs off 338 balls in 38 T20 matches — strike rate 109.8 vs 101.5 overall, average 24.7 vs 17.4 overall.
- Venue: Sikh Union Club Ground, Nairobi (T20)MEDIUM sample
187 runs off 135 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 138.5 vs 101.5 overall, average 26.7 vs 17.4 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
275 runs off 278 balls in 29 T20 matches — strike rate 98.9 vs 101.5 overall, average 34.4 vs 17.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Gymkhana Club Ground, Nairobi (T20)MEDIUM sample
124 runs off 146 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 84.9 vs 101.5 overall, average 13.8 vs 17.4 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
128 runs off 142 balls in 24 T20 matches — strike rate 90.1 vs 101.5 overall, average 12.8 vs 17.4 overall.
- Opposition: Uganda (T20)LOW sample
51 runs off 77 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 66.2 vs 101.5 overall, average 8.5 vs 17.4 overall.
- Venue: Entebbe Cricket Oval (T20)LOW sample
51 runs off 76 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 67.1 vs 101.5 overall, average 10.2 vs 17.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Nigeria | T20 | 8 | 134 | 123 | 16.8 | 108.9 | 13.8 | 41.5 | MEDIUM |
| Rwanda | T20 | 7 | 103 | 103 | 20.6 | 100.0 | 7.8 | 42.7 | LOW |
| Uganda | T20 | 8 | 51 | 77 | 8.5 | 66.2 | 7.8 | 63.6 | LOW |
| Botswana | T20 | 3 | 45 | 46 | 15.0 | 97.8 | 8.7 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 2 | 42 | 46 | 21.0 | 91.3 | 10.9 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Tanzania | T20 | 2 | 44 | 40 | 22.0 | 110.0 | 12.5 | 40.0 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 33 | 40 | 11.0 | 82.5 | 10.0 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Malawi | T20 | 2 | 54 | 38 | 54.0 | 142.1 | 23.7 | 36.8 | LOW |
| Sierra Leone | T20 | 1 | 45 | 34 | 45.0 | 132.4 | 17.6 | 35.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Gymkhana Club Ground, Nairobi | T20 | 12 | 124 | 146 | 13.8 | 84.9 | 5.5 | 49.3 | MEDIUM |
| Sikh Union Club Ground, Nairobi | T20 | 9 | 187 | 135 | 26.7 | 138.5 | 19.3 | 34.1 | MEDIUM |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 5 | 51 | 76 | 10.2 | 67.1 | 6.6 | 57.9 | LOW |
| Willowmoore Park, Benoni | T20 | 3 | 73 | 59 | 36.5 | 123.7 | 16.9 | 42.4 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 42 | 53 | 14.0 | 79.2 | 7.5 | 49.1 | LOW |
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 2 | 47 | 39 | 23.5 | 120.5 | 15.4 | 38.5 | LOW |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 36 | 38 | 12.0 | 94.7 | 13.2 | 47.4 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 44 | 635 | 614 | 17.6 | 103.4 | 12.5 | 46.3 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 42 | 53 | 14.0 | 79.2 | 7.5 | 49.1 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 30 | 332 | 335 | 13.8 | 99.1 | 9.3 | 40.9 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 29 | 275 | 278 | 34.4 | 98.9 | 15.1 | 55.4 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 9 | 70 | 54 | 10.0 | 129.6 | 14.8 | 35.2 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 38 | 371 | 338 | 24.7 | 109.8 | 15.1 | 47.3 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 25 | 178 | 187 | 12.7 | 95.2 | 7.0 | 42.8 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 24 | 128 | 142 | 12.8 | 90.1 | 12.0 | 49.3 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.