S Sinha betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 9 | 199 | 180 | 28.4 | 110.6 | 12.2 | 38.3 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 170 | 189 | 5 | 6.7 | 37.8 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where S Sinha scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Luxembourg (T20)LOW sample
117 runs off 91 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 128.6 vs 110.6 overall, average 58.5 vs 28.4 overall.
- Venue: Pierre Werner Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
117 runs off 91 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 128.6 vs 110.6 overall, average 58.5 vs 28.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Scott Page Field, Vinor (T20)LOW sample
82 runs off 89 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 92.1 vs 110.6 overall, average 16.4 vs 28.4 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
72 runs off 71 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 101.4 vs 110.6 overall, average 18.0 vs 28.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Luxembourg | T20 | 4 | 117 | 91 | 58.5 | 128.6 | 15.4 | 33.0 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 3 | 54 | 54 | 18.0 | 100.0 | 11.1 | 42.6 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 2 | 28 | 35 | 14.0 | 80.0 | 5.7 | 45.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Luxembourg | T20 | 90 | 96 | 2 | 6.4 | 48.0 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 56 | 70 | 0 | 7.5 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Pierre Werner Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 117 | 91 | 58.5 | 128.6 | 15.4 | 33.0 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 5 | 82 | 89 | 16.4 | 92.1 | 9.0 | 43.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Pierre Werner Cricket Ground | T20 | 90 | 96 | 2 | 6.4 | 48.0 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 80 | 93 | 3 | 7.0 | 31.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 9 | 199 | 180 | 28.4 | 110.6 | 12.2 | 38.3 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 170 | 189 | 5 | 6.7 | 37.8 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 9 | 115 | 102 | 38.3 | 112.7 | 12.7 | 41.2 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 5 | 72 | 71 | 18.0 | 101.4 | 9.9 | 35.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 78 | 73 | 1 | 5.6 | 73.0 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 56 | 55 | 3 | 5.9 | 18.3 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 36 | 61 | 1 | 10.2 | 61.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 9 | 167 | 158 | 23.9 | 105.7 | 11.4 | 41.1 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.