S Sunday betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 36 | 586 | 604 | 18.9 | 97.0 | 11.9 | 50.8 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where S Sunday scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda (T20)MEDIUM sample
228 runs off 203 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 112.3 vs 97.0 overall, average 28.5 vs 18.9 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
205 runs off 171 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 119.9 vs 97.0 overall, average 51.3 vs 18.9 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
185 runs off 123 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 150.4 vs 97.0 overall, average 23.1 vs 18.9 overall.
- Opposition: Brazil (T20)LOW sample
90 runs off 75 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 120.0 vs 97.0 overall, average 30.0 vs 18.9 overall.
- Venue: Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek (T20)LOW sample
69 runs off 61 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 113.1 vs 97.0 overall, average 69.0 vs 18.9 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
106 runs off 98 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 108.2 vs 97.0 overall, average 17.7 vs 18.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)HIGH sample
275 runs off 335 balls in 25 T20 matches — strike rate 82.1 vs 97.0 overall, average 13.1 vs 18.9 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
330 runs off 385 balls in 28 T20 matches — strike rate 85.7 vs 97.0 overall, average 19.4 vs 18.9 overall.
- Opposition: Uganda (T20)MEDIUM sample
97 runs off 137 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 70.8 vs 97.0 overall, average 24.3 vs 18.9 overall.
- Opposition: Rwanda (T20)LOW sample
82 runs off 103 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 79.6 vs 97.0 overall, average 10.3 vs 18.9 overall.
- Venue: Achimota Senior Secondary School A Field, Accra (T20)LOW sample
47 runs off 71 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 66.2 vs 97.0 overall, average 23.5 vs 18.9 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
71 runs off 96 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 74.0 vs 97.0 overall, average 11.8 vs 18.9 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Uganda | T20 | 4 | 97 | 137 | 24.3 | 70.8 | 8.0 | 57.7 | MEDIUM |
| Rwanda | T20 | 8 | 82 | 103 | 10.3 | 79.6 | 10.7 | 62.1 | LOW |
| Brazil | T20 | 5 | 90 | 75 | 30.0 | 120.0 | 10.7 | 34.7 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 3 | 68 | 74 | 22.7 | 91.9 | 10.8 | 48.6 | LOW |
| Sierra Leone | T20 | 3 | 57 | 41 | 28.5 | 139.0 | 22.0 | 39.0 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 1 | 32 | 36 | 32.0 | 88.9 | 13.9 | 58.3 | LOW |
| Cameroon | T20 | 1 | 53 | 35 | — | 151.4 | 17.1 | 28.6 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 10 | 228 | 203 | 28.5 | 112.3 | 12.8 | 46.3 | MEDIUM |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 10 | 119 | 122 | 14.9 | 97.5 | 12.3 | 50.0 | MEDIUM |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School A Field, Accra | T20 | 2 | 47 | 71 | 23.5 | 66.2 | 7.0 | 57.7 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 2 | 69 | 61 | 69.0 | 113.1 | 18.0 | 47.5 | LOW |
| Integrated Polytechnic Regional Centre | T20 | 2 | 36 | 44 | 18.0 | 81.8 | 11.4 | 59.1 | LOW |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School B Field, Accra | T20 | 1 | 40 | 36 | 40.0 | 111.1 | 13.9 | 41.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 36 | 586 | 604 | 18.9 | 97.0 | 11.9 | 50.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 28 | 330 | 385 | 19.4 | 85.7 | 10.1 | 52.5 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 11 | 185 | 123 | 23.1 | 150.4 | 19.5 | 35.0 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 13 | 71 | 96 | 11.8 | 74.0 | 9.4 | 64.6 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 25 | 275 | 335 | 13.1 | 82.1 | 9.9 | 56.4 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 20 | 205 | 171 | 51.3 | 119.9 | 14.6 | 40.4 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 15 | 106 | 98 | 17.7 | 108.2 | 14.3 | 50.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.