S Talamarla betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 10 | 103 | 129 | 12.9 | 79.8 | 7.0 | 48.8 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 287 | 259 | 16 | 5.4 | 16.2 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where S Talamarla scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Norway (T20)LOW sample
63 runs off 64 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 98.4 vs 79.8 overall, not yet dismissed vs 12.9 overall.
- Venue: Banks Field, Vinor (T20)LOW sample
63 runs off 64 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 98.4 vs 79.8 overall, not yet dismissed vs 12.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
No split is materially below their own format baseline.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Norway | T20 | 2 | 63 | 64 | — | 98.4 | 9.4 | 37.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| Portugal | T20 | 65 | 67 | 2 | 6.2 | 33.5 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 48 | 44 | 3 | 5.5 | 14.7 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 42 | 27 | 4 | 3.9 | 6.8 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 36 | 34 | 1 | 5.7 | 34.0 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 36 | 33 | 2 | 5.5 | 16.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Banks Field, Vinor | T20 | 2 | 63 | 64 | — | 98.4 | 9.4 | 37.5 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 3 | 24 | 35 | 8.0 | 68.6 | 5.7 | 60.0 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 5 | 16 | 30 | 3.2 | 53.3 | 3.3 | 60.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 143 | 138 | 9 | 5.8 | 15.3 | LOW |
| Banks Field, Vinor | T20 | 84 | 77 | 5 | 5.5 | 15.4 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 60 | 44 | 2 | 4.4 | 22.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 10 | 103 | 129 | 12.9 | 79.8 | 7.0 | 48.8 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 287 | 259 | 16 | 5.4 | 16.2 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 6 | 32 | 50 | 8.0 | 64.0 | 6.0 | 60.0 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 5 | 42 | 49 | 21.0 | 85.7 | 6.1 | 44.9 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 3 | 29 | 30 | 14.5 | 96.7 | 10.0 | 36.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 216 | 197 | 12 | 5.5 | 16.4 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 41 | 36 | 1 | 5.3 | 36.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 10 | 74 | 90 | 12.3 | 82.2 | 8.9 | 51.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.