S Thanikaithasan betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 25 | 375 | 292 | 18.8 | 128.4 | 14.7 | 36.3 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 20 | 26 | 1 | 7.8 | 26.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where S Thanikaithasan scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
155 runs off 128 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 121.1 vs 128.4 overall, average 31.0 vs 18.8 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
246 runs off 183 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 134.4 vs 128.4 overall, average 35.1 vs 18.8 overall.
- Opposition: Finland (T20)LOW sample
102 runs off 63 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 161.9 vs 128.4 overall, average 51.0 vs 18.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh (T20)LOW sample
69 runs off 83 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 83.1 vs 128.4 overall, average 23.0 vs 18.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Finland | T20 | 3 | 102 | 63 | 51.0 | 161.9 | 19.0 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Italy | T20 | 1 | 29 | 35 | — | 82.9 | 2.9 | 45.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 11 | 116 | 87 | 14.5 | 133.3 | 16.1 | 39.1 | LOW |
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 4 | 69 | 83 | 23.0 | 83.1 | 4.8 | 45.8 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 52 | 38 | 17.3 | 136.8 | 18.4 | 31.6 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 3 | 55 | 31 | 18.3 | 177.4 | 25.8 | 22.6 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 25 | 375 | 292 | 18.8 | 128.4 | 14.7 | 36.3 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 15 | 246 | 183 | 35.1 | 134.4 | 14.8 | 33.3 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 10 | 78 | 55 | 9.8 | 141.8 | 20.0 | 34.5 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 10 | 51 | 54 | 10.2 | 94.4 | 9.3 | 48.1 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 16 | 155 | 128 | 31.0 | 121.1 | 12.5 | 33.6 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 21 | 138 | 111 | 15.3 | 124.3 | 15.3 | 41.4 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 82 | 53 | 13.7 | 154.7 | 18.9 | 32.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.