SA Ahmad betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 28 | 605 | 494 | 25.2 | 122.5 | 15.2 | 37.9 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 486 | 501 | 27 | 6.2 | 18.6 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where SA Ahmad scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Finland (T20)MEDIUM sample
170 runs off 141 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 120.6 vs 122.5 overall, average 42.5 vs 25.2 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
218 runs off 180 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 121.1 vs 122.5 overall, average 36.3 vs 25.2 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
118 runs off 72 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 163.9 vs 122.5 overall, average 16.9 vs 25.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
269 runs off 242 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 111.2 vs 122.5 overall, average 24.5 vs 25.2 overall.
- Venue: Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh (T20)LOW sample
74 runs off 67 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 110.4 vs 122.5 overall, average 18.5 vs 25.2 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
109 runs off 101 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 107.9 vs 122.5 overall, average 109.0 vs 25.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Finland | T20 | 5 | 170 | 141 | 42.5 | 120.6 | 12.8 | 40.4 | MEDIUM |
| Germany | T20 | 3 | 47 | 45 | 15.7 | 104.4 | 15.6 | 48.9 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 2 | 77 | 45 | 38.5 | 171.1 | 22.2 | 22.2 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 1 | 53 | 41 | — | 129.3 | 19.5 | 41.5 | LOW |
| Gibraltar | T20 | 1 | 55 | 41 | 55.0 | 134.1 | 19.5 | 34.1 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 1 | 46 | 36 | 46.0 | 127.8 | 16.7 | 30.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Germany | T20 | 66 | 58 | 4 | 5.3 | 14.5 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 60 | 70 | 3 | 7.0 | 23.3 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 48 | 48 | 4 | 6.0 | 12.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 12 | 250 | 201 | 25.0 | 124.4 | 13.9 | 36.3 | MEDIUM |
| Goldenacre, Edinburgh | T20 | 2 | 99 | 77 | 99.0 | 128.6 | 18.2 | 36.4 | LOW |
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 4 | 74 | 67 | 18.5 | 110.4 | 14.9 | 44.8 | LOW |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 3 | 82 | 66 | 27.3 | 124.2 | 18.2 | 36.4 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 82 | 52 | 41.0 | 157.7 | 19.2 | 30.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 198 | 191 | 14 | 5.8 | 13.6 | MEDIUM |
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 60 | 64 | 4 | 6.4 | 16.0 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 60 | 51 | 1 | 5.1 | 51.0 | LOW |
| Goldenacre, Edinburgh | T20 | 48 | 53 | 3 | 6.6 | 17.7 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 48 | 61 | 2 | 7.6 | 30.5 | LOW |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 48 | 60 | 2 | 7.5 | 30.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 28 | 605 | 494 | 25.2 | 122.5 | 15.2 | 37.9 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 486 | 501 | 27 | 6.2 | 18.6 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 20 | 269 | 242 | 24.5 | 111.2 | 10.3 | 33.5 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 17 | 218 | 180 | 36.3 | 121.1 | 18.9 | 48.3 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 9 | 118 | 72 | 16.9 | 163.9 | 22.2 | 26.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 258 | 253 | 14 | 5.9 | 18.1 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 150 | 157 | 10 | 6.3 | 15.7 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 78 | 91 | 3 | 7.0 | 30.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 27 | 277 | 217 | 23.1 | 127.6 | 16.6 | 36.9 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 19 | 219 | 176 | 19.9 | 124.4 | 17.0 | 40.3 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 16 | 109 | 101 | 109.0 | 107.9 | 8.9 | 35.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.