SA Edwards betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | ODI | 54 | 1721 | 1897 | 39.1 | 90.7 | 7.4 | 42.7 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 48 | 894 | 723 | 24.2 | 123.7 | 11.9 | 29.9 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where SA Edwards scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: VRA Ground, Amstelveen (ODI)HIGH sample
457 runs off 469 balls in 8 ODI matches — strike rate 97.4 vs 90.7 overall, average 65.3 vs 39.1 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (ODI)HIGH sample
882 runs off 923 balls in 49 ODI matches — strike rate 95.6 vs 90.7 overall, average 51.9 vs 39.1 overall.
- Phase: death (ODI)HIGH sample
414 runs off 332 balls in 18 ODI matches — strike rate 124.7 vs 90.7 overall, average 29.6 vs 39.1 overall.
- Opposition: England (ODI)MEDIUM sample
252 runs off 242 balls in 4 ODI matches — strike rate 104.1 vs 90.7 overall, average 84.0 vs 39.1 overall.
- Opposition: Zimbabwe (ODI)MEDIUM sample
160 runs off 151 balls in 4 ODI matches — strike rate 106.0 vs 90.7 overall, average 40.0 vs 39.1 overall.
- Opposition: United States of America (ODI)MEDIUM sample
134 runs off 120 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 111.7 vs 90.7 overall, average 67.0 vs 39.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)HIGH sample
706 runs off 804 balls in 46 ODI matches — strike rate 87.8 vs 90.7 overall, average 30.7 vs 39.1 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (ODI)MEDIUM sample
133 runs off 170 balls in 16 ODI matches — strike rate 78.2 vs 90.7 overall, average 33.3 vs 39.1 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (ODI)LOW sample
62 runs off 114 balls in 4 ODI matches — strike rate 54.4 vs 90.7 overall, average 31.0 vs 39.1 overall.
- Opposition: Canada (ODI)LOW sample
73 runs off 101 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 72.3 vs 90.7 overall, average 36.5 vs 39.1 overall.
- Opposition: Bangladesh (ODI)LOW sample
68 runs off 89 balls in 1 ODI match — strike rate 76.4 vs 90.7 overall, average 68.0 vs 39.1 overall.
- Opposition: Scotland (T20)LOW sample
97 runs off 86 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 112.8 vs 123.7 overall, average 24.3 vs 24.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| England | ODI | 4 | 252 | 242 | 84.0 | 104.1 | 7.9 | 36.8 | MEDIUM |
| United Arab Emirates | ODI | 4 | 185 | 209 | 61.7 | 88.5 | 6.7 | 40.7 | MEDIUM |
| Scotland | ODI | 5 | 176 | 195 | 35.2 | 90.3 | 7.2 | 43.6 | MEDIUM |
| West Indies | ODI | 4 | 166 | 173 | 41.5 | 96.0 | 5.8 | 33.5 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 4 | 160 | 151 | 40.0 | 106.0 | 10.6 | 39.1 | MEDIUM |
| United States of America | ODI | 3 | 134 | 120 | 67.0 | 111.7 | 10.0 | 30.8 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia | ODI | 4 | 62 | 114 | 31.0 | 54.4 | 3.5 | 60.5 | LOW |
| South Africa | ODI | 3 | 125 | 111 | 62.5 | 112.6 | 14.4 | 44.1 | LOW |
| Canada | ODI | 2 | 73 | 101 | 36.5 | 72.3 | 3.0 | 44.6 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 4 | 137 | 94 | 68.5 | 145.7 | 11.7 | 20.2 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | ODI | 1 | 68 | 89 | 68.0 | 76.4 | 6.7 | 51.7 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | ODI | 3 | 84 | 86 | 84.0 | 97.7 | 8.1 | 44.2 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 5 | 97 | 86 | 24.3 | 112.8 | 10.5 | 34.9 | LOW |
| Pakistan | ODI | 4 | 82 | 77 | 27.3 | 106.5 | 10.4 | 33.8 | LOW |
| Oman | T20 | 3 | 115 | 73 | 38.3 | 157.5 | 17.8 | 26.0 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 4 | 62 | 65 | 15.5 | 95.4 | 9.2 | 41.5 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 6 | 70 | 58 | 10.0 | 120.7 | 12.1 | 36.2 | LOW |
| New Zealand | ODI | 4 | 46 | 51 | 11.5 | 90.2 | 7.8 | 45.1 | LOW |
| Nepal | ODI | 1 | 33 | 49 | 33.0 | 67.3 | 2.0 | 42.9 | LOW |
| Pakistan | T20 | 2 | 52 | 49 | 26.0 | 106.1 | 10.2 | 34.7 | LOW |
| Ireland | ODI | 3 | 24 | 42 | 8.0 | 57.1 | 7.1 | 73.8 | LOW |
| Guernsey | T20 | 1 | 48 | 40 | — | 120.0 | 7.5 | 20.0 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | T20 | 2 | 52 | 39 | 26.0 | 133.3 | 15.4 | 33.3 | LOW |
| New Zealand | T20 | 2 | 46 | 36 | 46.0 | 127.8 | 16.7 | 30.6 | LOW |
| Oman | ODI | 3 | 22 | 35 | 7.3 | 62.9 | 8.6 | 65.7 | LOW |
| Italy | T20 | 1 | 37 | 31 | — | 119.4 | 6.5 | 22.6 | LOW |
| India | ODI | 1 | 17 | 30 | 17.0 | 56.7 | 3.3 | 53.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 8 | 457 | 469 | 65.3 | 97.4 | 6.0 | 35.0 | HIGH |
| Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam | ODI | 7 | 216 | 252 | 36.0 | 85.7 | 6.0 | 40.9 | MEDIUM |
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 6 | 165 | 161 | 33.0 | 102.5 | 9.9 | 40.4 | MEDIUM |
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 4 | 146 | 117 | 146.0 | 124.8 | 9.4 | 24.8 | LOW |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | ODI | 4 | 87 | 116 | 21.8 | 75.0 | 6.9 | 50.9 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 5 | 87 | 115 | 21.8 | 75.7 | 7.8 | 58.3 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, The Hague | T20 | 7 | 122 | 109 | 20.3 | 111.9 | 12.8 | 35.8 | LOW |
| Takashinga Sports Club, Highfield, Harare | ODI | 2 | 134 | 107 | 134.0 | 125.2 | 12.1 | 28.0 | LOW |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | ODI | 2 | 54 | 93 | 54.0 | 58.1 | 4.3 | 60.2 | LOW |
| Eden Gardens, Kolkata | ODI | 1 | 68 | 89 | 68.0 | 76.4 | 6.7 | 51.7 | LOW |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | ODI | 2 | 92 | 89 | 92.0 | 103.4 | 10.1 | 42.7 | LOW |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | T20 | 3 | 115 | 73 | 38.3 | 157.5 | 17.8 | 26.0 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | ODI | 3 | 41 | 70 | 20.5 | 58.6 | 1.4 | 48.6 | LOW |
| Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association Stadium, Dharamsala | ODI | 1 | 78 | 68 | — | 114.7 | 16.2 | 44.1 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, The Hague | ODI | 2 | 66 | 62 | 33.0 | 106.5 | 9.7 | 33.9 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 3 | 88 | 47 | 44.0 | 187.2 | 19.1 | 17.0 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 4 | 57 | 45 | 14.3 | 126.7 | 13.3 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Maharashtra Cricket Association Stadium, Pune | ODI | 1 | 38 | 42 | 38.0 | 90.5 | 9.5 | 45.2 | LOW |
| GMHBA Stadium, South Geelong, Victoria | T20 | 3 | 38 | 39 | 19.0 | 97.4 | 7.7 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Titwood, Glasgow | T20 | 4 | 47 | 36 | 11.8 | 130.6 | 11.1 | 25.0 | LOW |
| The Wanderers Stadium, Johannesburg | ODI | 1 | 42 | 33 | 42.0 | 127.3 | 15.2 | 39.4 | LOW |
| M Chinnaswamy Stadium, Bengaluru | ODI | 1 | 17 | 30 | 17.0 | 56.7 | 3.3 | 53.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | ODI | 48 | 1556 | 1736 | 39.9 | 89.6 | 7.2 | 42.9 | HIGH |
| Unknown | T20 | 48 | 894 | 723 | 24.2 | 123.7 | 11.9 | 29.9 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 6 | 165 | 161 | 33.0 | 102.5 | 9.9 | 40.4 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | ODI | 52 | 1299 | 1547 | 43.3 | 84.0 | 7.0 | 46.7 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 38 | 542 | 456 | 27.1 | 118.9 | 11.0 | 29.4 | HIGH |
| death | ODI | 18 | 414 | 332 | 29.6 | 124.7 | 9.9 | 23.5 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 24 | 261 | 178 | 18.6 | 146.6 | 15.2 | 24.7 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 14 | 91 | 89 | 30.3 | 102.2 | 10.1 | 42.7 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | ODI | 49 | 882 | 923 | 51.9 | 95.6 | 8.2 | 40.6 | HIGH |
| PACE | ODI | 46 | 706 | 804 | 30.7 | 87.8 | 6.6 | 43.7 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 43 | 493 | 395 | 30.8 | 124.8 | 11.1 | 27.3 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 39 | 347 | 276 | 19.3 | 125.7 | 13.8 | 33.3 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | ODI | 16 | 133 | 170 | 33.3 | 78.2 | 7.1 | 49.4 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 54 | 52 | 18.0 | 103.8 | 7.7 | 30.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.