£
ExclusiveFreeBets
.com

SA Wittmann betting stats, splits & projections

All-rounder

Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.

Record by format

Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.

overallT20721240128218.896.714.955.1HIGH
overallT20545492305.416.4HIGH

Why we like it

Splits where SA Wittmann scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.

  • Opposition: Tanzania (T20)MEDIUM sample

    168 runs off 147 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 114.3 vs 96.7 overall, average 56.0 vs 18.8 overall.

  • Venue: High Performance Oval, Windhoek (T20)MEDIUM sample

    351 runs off 278 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 126.3 vs 96.7 overall, average 39.0 vs 18.8 overall.

  • Opposition: Hong Kong (T20)LOW sample

    102 runs off 93 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 109.7 vs 96.7 overall, average 20.4 vs 18.8 overall.

  • Venue: Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong (T20)LOW sample

    93 runs off 76 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 122.4 vs 96.7 overall, average 31.0 vs 18.8 overall.

  • Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample

    127 runs off 101 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 125.7 vs 96.7 overall, average 63.5 vs 18.8 overall.

Risks

Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.

  • Opposition: Uganda (T20)HIGH sample

    263 runs off 316 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 83.2 vs 96.7 overall, average 14.6 vs 18.8 overall.

  • Opposition: Zimbabwe (T20)MEDIUM sample

    151 runs off 176 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 85.8 vs 96.7 overall, average 16.8 vs 18.8 overall.

  • Venue: Entebbe Cricket Oval (T20)MEDIUM sample

    130 runs off 159 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 81.8 vs 96.7 overall, average 13.0 vs 18.8 overall.

  • Venue: Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok (T20)LOW sample

    102 runs off 115 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 88.7 vs 96.7 overall, average 20.4 vs 18.8 overall.

  • Venue: Centre for Cricket Development Ground, Windhoek (T20)LOW sample

    59 runs off 98 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 60.2 vs 96.7 overall, average 9.8 vs 18.8 overall.

  • Venue: Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok (T20)LOW sample

    45 runs off 72 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 62.5 vs 96.7 overall, average 9.0 vs 18.8 overall.

Against each opponent

Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.

UgandaT202026331614.683.211.157.0HIGH
ZimbabweT201015117616.885.813.158.0MEDIUM
United Arab EmiratesT20614315023.895.312.747.3MEDIUM
TanzaniaT20416814756.0114.318.455.1MEDIUM
Hong KongT2061029320.4109.719.451.6LOW
ThailandT204778419.391.716.758.3LOW
Papua New GuineaT203335711.057.97.064.9LOW
NetherlandsT20526435.260.57.060.5LOW
MalaysiaT202483524.0137.122.945.7LOW
Sierra LeoneT201783578.0222.940.025.7LOW

Bowling

UgandaT2013211485.214.3LOW
NetherlandsT201149044.722.5LOW
ZimbabweT20908055.316.0LOW
Hong KongT20422042.95.0LOW
MalaysiaT20362524.212.5LOW

By venue

Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.

High Performance Oval, WindhoekT201135127839.0126.319.848.2MEDIUM
Entebbe Cricket OvalT201113015913.081.813.865.4MEDIUM
Wanderers Cricket Ground, WindhoekT20615915526.5102.614.848.4MEDIUM
Namibia Cricket Ground, WindhoekT20713313522.298.514.851.9MEDIUM
Asian Institute of Technology Ground, BangkokT20510211520.488.712.253.0LOW
Centre for Cricket Development Ground, WindhoekT20759989.860.29.265.3LOW
Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong KongT204937631.0122.422.451.3LOW
Terdthai Cricket Ground, BangkokT20545729.062.59.765.3LOW
United Cricket Club Ground, WindhoekT20654709.077.110.058.6LOW
Sportpark Westvliet, VoorburgT20323367.763.98.361.1LOW
Selangor Turf Club, Kuala LumpurT202483524.0137.122.945.7LOW
Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, KirtipurT202303215.093.812.556.3LOW

Bowling

Centre for Cricket Development Ground, WindhoekT201088894.99.8LOW
High Performance Oval, WindhoekT20666405.8—LOW
Sportpark Westvliet, VoorburgT20664414.044.0LOW
Namibia Cricket Ground, WindhoekT20483133.910.3LOW
Selangor Turf Club, Kuala LumpurT20362524.212.5LOW
Terdthai Cricket Ground, BangkokT20364617.746.0LOW

By country

Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.

UnknownT20721240128218.896.714.955.1HIGH

Bowling

UnknownT20545492305.416.4HIGH

By match phase

Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.

powerplayT206782985423.097.116.057.8HIGH
middleT203238439215.498.013.349.2HIGH
deathT20527365.475.05.655.6LOW

Bowling

middleT20264250115.722.7MEDIUM
powerplayT2014412185.015.1LOW
deathT20137121115.311.0LOW

Against pace and spin

Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.

PACET206662564420.897.016.057.3HIGH
SPINT205448853714.490.912.553.8HIGH
UNKNOWNT201612710163.5125.720.848.5LOW

How these splits are used

The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.