£
ExclusiveFreeBets
.com

Saber Zakhil betting stats, splits & projections

Batter

Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.

Record by format

Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.

overallT202652233120.9157.723.043.8HIGH
overallT2018325568.442.5MEDIUM

Why we like it

Splits where Saber Zakhil scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.

  • Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample

    299 runs off 177 balls in 23 T20 matches — strike rate 168.9 vs 157.7 overall, average 19.9 vs 20.9 overall.

  • Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample

    238 runs off 124 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 191.9 vs 157.7 overall, average 19.8 vs 20.9 overall.

  • Opposition: Austria (T20)LOW sample

    130 runs off 75 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 173.3 vs 157.7 overall, average 32.5 vs 20.9 overall.

  • Venue: Velden Cricket Ground, Latschach (T20)LOW sample

    105 runs off 63 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 166.7 vs 157.7 overall, average 35.0 vs 20.9 overall.

Risks

Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.

  • Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample

    169 runs off 126 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 134.1 vs 157.7 overall, average 28.2 vs 20.9 overall.

  • Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample

    256 runs off 196 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 130.6 vs 157.7 overall, average 23.3 vs 20.9 overall.

  • Venue: Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample

    106 runs off 77 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 137.7 vs 157.7 overall, average 21.2 vs 20.9 overall.

Against each opponent

Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.

AustriaT2051307532.5173.324.032.0LOW
PortugalT204824920.5167.324.546.9LOW
MaltaT203924230.7219.035.733.3LOW
GermanyT202624031.0155.020.042.5LOW

Bowling

AustriaT2060109210.954.5LOW
PortugalT203660110.060.0LOW

By venue

Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.

Bayer Uerdingen Cricket GroundT2061067721.2137.718.249.4LOW
Velden Cricket Ground, LatschachT2041056335.0166.720.631.7LOW
Stars Arena Hofstade, ZemstT2041185629.5210.733.941.1LOW
Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, WaterlooT204735418.3135.220.451.9LOW
Dreux Sport Cricket ClubT203443711.0118.916.251.4LOW

Bowling

Koge Cricket ClubT20453905.2—LOW
Stars Arena Hofstade, ZemstT20426419.164.0LOW
Velden Cricket Ground, LatschachT204285012.1—LOW

By country

Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.

UnknownT202652233120.9157.723.043.8HIGH

Bowling

UnknownT2018325568.442.5MEDIUM

By match phase

Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.

middleT202125619623.3130.617.948.5MEDIUM
deathT201423812419.8191.929.037.9MEDIUM

Bowling

middleT2012619539.365.0LOW
deathT20455427.227.0LOW

Against pace and spin

Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.

PACET202329917719.9168.925.441.8MEDIUM
SPINT201816912628.2134.118.347.6MEDIUM

How these splits are used

The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.