Saif-Ul Islam betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 5 | 158 | 124 | 39.5 | 127.4 | 14.5 | 33.9 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where Saif-Ul Islam scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Gibraltar (T20)LOW sample
91 runs off 63 balls in 1 T20 match — strike rate 144.4 vs 127.4 overall, not yet dismissed vs 39.5 overall.
- Venue: Koge Cricket Club (T20)LOW sample
91 runs off 63 balls in 1 T20 match — strike rate 144.4 vs 127.4 overall, not yet dismissed vs 39.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm (T20)LOW sample
67 runs off 61 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 109.8 vs 127.4 overall, average 16.8 vs 39.5 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
76 runs off 65 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 116.9 vs 127.4 overall, average 76.0 vs 39.5 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Gibraltar | T20 | 1 | 91 | 63 | — | 144.4 | 14.3 | 28.6 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 2 | 39 | 42 | 19.5 | 92.9 | 14.3 | 45.2 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 1 | 91 | 63 | — | 144.4 | 14.3 | 28.6 | LOW |
| Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm | T20 | 4 | 67 | 61 | 16.8 | 109.8 | 14.8 | 39.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 5 | 158 | 124 | 39.5 | 127.4 | 14.5 | 33.9 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 5 | 76 | 65 | 76.0 | 116.9 | 13.8 | 38.5 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 4 | 54 | 42 | 18.0 | 128.6 | 14.3 | 31.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 5 | 54 | 55 | 27.0 | 98.2 | 7.3 | 38.2 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 3 | 59 | 37 | 29.5 | 159.5 | 21.6 | 29.7 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 2 | 45 | 32 | — | 140.6 | 18.8 | 31.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.