Sazib Bhuiyan betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 30 | 528 | 378 | 20.3 | 139.7 | 20.1 | 40.7 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 517 | 759 | 40 | 8.8 | 19.0 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Sazib Bhuiyan scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
229 runs off 149 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 153.7 vs 139.7 overall, average 22.9 vs 20.3 overall.
- Venue: Tikkurila Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
123 runs off 89 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 138.2 vs 139.7 overall, average 30.8 vs 20.3 overall.
- Venue: Scott Page Field, Vinor (T20)LOW sample
99 runs off 67 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 147.8 vs 139.7 overall, average 14.1 vs 20.3 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
137 runs off 86 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 159.3 vs 139.7 overall, average 137.0 vs 20.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
215 runs off 165 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 130.3 vs 139.7 overall, average 12.6 vs 20.3 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
235 runs off 188 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 125.0 vs 139.7 overall, average 19.6 vs 20.3 overall.
- Opposition: Romania (T20)LOW sample
109 runs off 84 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 129.8 vs 139.7 overall, average 27.3 vs 20.3 overall.
- Venue: Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County (T20)LOW sample
104 runs off 81 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 128.4 vs 139.7 overall, average 26.0 vs 20.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Romania | T20 | 5 | 109 | 84 | 27.3 | 129.8 | 19.0 | 40.5 | LOW |
| Greece | T20 | 2 | 68 | 52 | 34.0 | 130.8 | 17.3 | 32.7 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 1 | 71 | 44 | 71.0 | 161.4 | 22.7 | 36.4 | LOW |
| Bulgaria | T20 | 2 | 41 | 31 | 20.5 | 132.3 | 16.1 | 25.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Romania | T20 | 120 | 155 | 9 | 7.8 | 17.2 | LOW |
| Hungary | T20 | 65 | 97 | 7 | 9.0 | 13.9 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 58 | 122 | 5 | 12.6 | 24.4 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 48 | 66 | 5 | 8.3 | 13.2 | LOW |
| Bulgaria | T20 | 42 | 61 | 1 | 8.7 | 61.0 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 42 | 65 | 2 | 9.3 | 32.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 123 | 89 | 30.8 | 138.2 | 18.0 | 34.8 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 4 | 104 | 81 | 26.0 | 128.4 | 18.5 | 40.7 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 10 | 99 | 67 | 14.1 | 147.8 | 22.4 | 52.2 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 83 | 53 | 20.8 | 156.6 | 18.9 | 37.7 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 2 | 59 | 42 | 29.5 | 140.5 | 21.4 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 3 | 45 | 31 | 15.0 | 145.2 | 29.0 | 45.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 177 | 303 | 17 | 10.3 | 17.8 | MEDIUM |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 120 | 160 | 7 | 8.0 | 22.9 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 96 | 116 | 7 | 7.3 | 16.6 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 45 | 82 | 1 | 10.9 | 82.0 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 42 | 49 | 4 | 7.0 | 12.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 30 | 528 | 378 | 20.3 | 139.7 | 20.1 | 40.7 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 517 | 759 | 40 | 8.8 | 19.0 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 16 | 235 | 188 | 19.6 | 125.0 | 14.4 | 38.8 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 18 | 229 | 149 | 22.9 | 153.7 | 27.5 | 45.6 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 6 | 64 | 41 | 16.0 | 156.1 | 19.5 | 31.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 298 | 448 | 15 | 9.0 | 29.9 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 153 | 218 | 21 | 8.5 | 10.4 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 66 | 93 | 4 | 8.5 | 23.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 26 | 215 | 165 | 12.6 | 130.3 | 18.2 | 41.8 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 176 | 127 | 22.0 | 138.6 | 21.3 | 42.5 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 15 | 137 | 86 | 137.0 | 159.3 | 22.1 | 36.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.