Shaheryar Butt betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 30 | 662 | 538 | 27.6 | 123.0 | 17.1 | 43.1 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 7 | 18 | 0 | 15.4 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Shaheryar Butt scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Austria (T20)MEDIUM sample
215 runs off 154 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 139.6 vs 123.0 overall, average 43.0 vs 27.6 overall.
- Venue: Velden Cricket Ground, Latschach (T20)MEDIUM sample
179 runs off 134 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 133.6 vs 123.0 overall, average 44.8 vs 27.6 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
279 runs off 209 balls in 23 T20 matches — strike rate 133.5 vs 123.0 overall, average 23.3 vs 27.6 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
111 runs off 67 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 165.7 vs 123.0 overall, average 18.5 vs 27.6 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: France (T20)LOW sample
94 runs off 83 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 113.3 vs 123.0 overall, average 47.0 vs 27.6 overall.
- Opposition: Malta (T20)LOW sample
69 runs off 60 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 115.0 vs 123.0 overall, average 23.0 vs 27.6 overall.
- Venue: Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
93 runs off 87 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 106.9 vs 123.0 overall, average 15.5 vs 27.6 overall.
- Venue: Dreux Sport Cricket Club (T20)LOW sample
72 runs off 70 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 102.9 vs 123.0 overall, average 24.0 vs 27.6 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
91 runs off 89 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 102.2 vs 123.0 overall, average 45.5 vs 27.6 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Austria | T20 | 5 | 215 | 154 | 43.0 | 139.6 | 20.1 | 37.7 | MEDIUM |
| France | T20 | 4 | 94 | 83 | 47.0 | 113.3 | 15.7 | 47.0 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 4 | 69 | 60 | 23.0 | 115.0 | 15.0 | 40.0 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 2 | 61 | 52 | 30.5 | 117.3 | 15.4 | 42.3 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 4 | 41 | 38 | 10.3 | 107.9 | 10.5 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 2 | 56 | 38 | 28.0 | 147.4 | 21.1 | 39.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Velden Cricket Ground, Latschach | T20 | 4 | 179 | 134 | 44.8 | 133.6 | 19.4 | 38.8 | MEDIUM |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 6 | 93 | 87 | 15.5 | 106.9 | 13.8 | 46.0 | LOW |
| Stars Arena Hofstade, Zemst | T20 | 5 | 82 | 71 | 20.5 | 115.5 | 12.7 | 39.4 | LOW |
| Dreux Sport Cricket Club | T20 | 4 | 72 | 70 | 24.0 | 102.9 | 14.3 | 51.4 | LOW |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 4 | 82 | 59 | 27.3 | 139.0 | 22.0 | 47.5 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 3 | 77 | 51 | 38.5 | 151.0 | 21.6 | 35.3 | LOW |
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 1 | 50 | 35 | 50.0 | 142.9 | 20.0 | 37.1 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 30 | 662 | 538 | 27.6 | 123.0 | 17.1 | 43.1 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 29 | 492 | 415 | 28.9 | 118.6 | 15.7 | 43.6 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 9 | 111 | 67 | 18.5 | 165.7 | 26.9 | 34.3 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 12 | 59 | 56 | 59.0 | 105.4 | 16.1 | 50.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 24 | 292 | 240 | 29.2 | 121.7 | 16.7 | 43.8 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 23 | 279 | 209 | 23.3 | 133.5 | 18.7 | 40.2 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 12 | 91 | 89 | 45.5 | 102.2 | 14.6 | 48.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.