Shiraz Khan betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 21 | 257 | 265 | 21.4 | 97.0 | 7.9 | 41.1 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 736 | 786 | 36 | 6.4 | 21.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Shiraz Khan scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
150 runs off 138 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 108.7 vs 97.0 overall, average 30.0 vs 21.4 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
154 runs off 122 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 126.2 vs 97.0 overall, average 19.3 vs 21.4 overall.
- Opposition: Bahrain (T20)LOW sample
126 runs off 77 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 163.6 vs 97.0 overall, average 126.0 vs 21.4 overall.
- Venue: Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) (T20)LOW sample
87 runs off 72 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 120.8 vs 97.0 overall, average 29.0 vs 21.4 overall.
- Venue: Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong (T20)LOW sample
73 runs off 61 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 119.7 vs 97.0 overall, average 36.5 vs 21.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
103 runs off 143 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 72.0 vs 97.0 overall, average 25.8 vs 21.4 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
74 runs off 80 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 92.5 vs 97.0 overall, average 12.3 vs 21.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Bahrain | T20 | 5 | 126 | 77 | 126.0 | 163.6 | 19.5 | 28.6 | LOW |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 4 | 31 | 43 | 10.3 | 72.1 | 2.3 | 39.5 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 2 | 19 | 39 | 19.0 | 48.7 | 2.6 | 61.5 | LOW |
| Malaysia | T20 | 2 | 28 | 34 | 14.0 | 82.4 | 2.9 | 38.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| Bahrain | T20 | 154 | 169 | 7 | 6.6 | 24.1 | MEDIUM |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 132 | 153 | 6 | 7.0 | 25.5 | LOW |
| Malaysia | T20 | 72 | 66 | 3 | 5.5 | 22.0 | LOW |
| Singapore | T20 | 48 | 61 | 3 | 7.6 | 20.3 | LOW |
| Qatar | T20 | 42 | 45 | 2 | 6.4 | 22.5 | LOW |
| Saudi Arabia | T20 | 42 | 75 | 0 | 10.7 | — | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 42 | 45 | 2 | 6.4 | 22.5 | LOW |
| Maldives | T20 | 36 | 19 | 1 | 3.2 | 19.0 | LOW |
| Vanuatu | T20 | 36 | 25 | 4 | 4.2 | 6.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | T20 | 7 | 87 | 72 | 29.0 | 120.8 | 11.1 | 31.9 | LOW |
| Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong | T20 | 3 | 73 | 61 | 36.5 | 119.7 | 13.1 | 42.6 | LOW |
| West End Park International Cricket Stadium, Doha | T20 | 3 | 40 | 50 | 13.3 | 80.0 | 6.0 | 46.0 | LOW |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 4 | 27 | 34 | 9.0 | 79.4 | 2.9 | 41.2 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 19 | 33 | — | 57.6 | 3.0 | 57.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | T20 | 156 | 205 | 6 | 7.9 | 34.2 | MEDIUM |
| West End Park International Cricket Stadium, Doha | T20 | 144 | 176 | 6 | 7.3 | 29.3 | LOW |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 142 | 93 | 12 | 3.9 | 7.8 | LOW |
| Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong | T20 | 84 | 92 | 1 | 6.6 | 92.0 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 72 | 93 | 4 | 7.8 | 23.3 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 72 | 72 | 3 | 6.0 | 24.0 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 66 | 55 | 4 | 5.0 | 13.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 21 | 257 | 265 | 21.4 | 97.0 | 7.9 | 41.1 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 736 | 786 | 36 | 6.4 | 21.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 16 | 103 | 143 | 25.8 | 72.0 | 3.5 | 45.5 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 16 | 154 | 122 | 19.3 | 126.2 | 13.1 | 36.1 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 610 | 591 | 31 | 5.8 | 19.1 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 96 | 132 | 4 | 8.3 | 33.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 15 | 150 | 138 | 30.0 | 108.7 | 10.9 | 44.9 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 17 | 74 | 80 | 12.3 | 92.5 | 6.3 | 35.0 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 8 | 33 | 47 | 33.0 | 70.2 | 2.1 | 40.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.