Shubham Ranjane betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 6 | 164 | 106 | 41.0 | 154.7 | 17.0 | 22.6 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 24 | 26 | 1 | 6.5 | 26.0 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Pakistan | T20 | 1 | 51 | 30 | 51.0 | 170.0 | 20.0 | 16.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Sinhalese Sports Club Ground, Colombo | T20 | 1 | 51 | 30 | 51.0 | 170.0 | 20.0 | 16.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 5 | 158 | 99 | 52.7 | 159.6 | 17.2 | 20.2 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| death | T20 | 5 | 99 | 53 | 33.0 | 186.8 | 22.6 | 17.0 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 4 | 59 | 46 | — | 128.3 | 10.9 | 23.9 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 5 | 102 | 55 | 25.5 | 185.5 | 23.6 | 21.8 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 4 | 56 | 47 | — | 119.1 | 8.5 | 23.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.