SK Reddy betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 7 | 123 | 157 | 61.5 | 78.3 | 6.4 | 51.0 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 149 | 107 | 10 | 4.3 | 10.7 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where SK Reddy scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Scott Page Field, Vinor (T20)LOW sample
55 runs off 63 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 87.3 vs 78.3 overall, not yet dismissed vs 61.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
49 runs off 74 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 66.2 vs 78.3 overall, not yet dismissed vs 61.5 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Gibraltar | T20 | 1 | 47 | 51 | — | 92.2 | 7.8 | 45.1 | LOW |
| Guernsey | T20 | 1 | 30 | 38 | 30.0 | 78.9 | 5.3 | 52.6 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 2 | 21 | 32 | — | 65.6 | 6.3 | 59.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Czech Republic | T20 | 42 | 29 | 3 | 4.1 | 9.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 4 | 63 | 85 | 31.5 | 74.1 | 7.1 | 56.5 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 2 | 55 | 63 | — | 87.3 | 6.3 | 44.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 65 | 47 | 6 | 4.3 | 7.8 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 42 | 35 | 2 | 5.0 | 17.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 7 | 123 | 157 | 61.5 | 78.3 | 6.4 | 51.0 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 149 | 107 | 10 | 4.3 | 10.7 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 5 | 49 | 74 | — | 66.2 | 4.1 | 54.1 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 4 | 51 | 53 | 25.5 | 96.2 | 13.2 | 56.6 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 3 | 23 | 30 | — | 76.7 | 0.0 | 33.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 108 | 70 | 6 | 3.9 | 11.7 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 7 | 82 | 102 | 82.0 | 80.4 | 6.9 | 49.0 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 5 | 35 | 47 | 35.0 | 74.5 | 6.4 | 59.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.