SKS Gill betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 39 | 846 | 831 | 24.2 | 101.8 | 10.5 | 39.7 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 215 | 274 | 9 | 7.6 | 30.4 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where SKS Gill scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
511 runs off 447 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 114.3 vs 101.8 overall, average 31.9 vs 24.2 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
302 runs off 273 balls in 25 T20 matches — strike rate 110.6 vs 101.8 overall, average 23.2 vs 24.2 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
141 runs off 113 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 124.8 vs 101.8 overall, average 35.3 vs 24.2 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
113 runs off 80 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 141.3 vs 101.8 overall, average 16.1 vs 24.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
403 runs off 445 balls in 33 T20 matches — strike rate 90.6 vs 101.8 overall, average 22.4 vs 24.2 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
222 runs off 304 balls in 30 T20 matches — strike rate 73.0 vs 101.8 overall, average 18.5 vs 24.2 overall.
- Opposition: France (T20)LOW sample
53 runs off 73 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 72.6 vs 101.8 overall, average 13.3 vs 24.2 overall.
- Opposition: Romania (T20)LOW sample
53 runs off 66 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 80.3 vs 101.8 overall, average 17.7 vs 24.2 overall.
- Opposition: Czech Republic (T20)LOW sample
64 runs off 65 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 98.5 vs 101.8 overall, average 16.0 vs 24.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Switzerland | T20 | 5 | 143 | 140 | 28.6 | 102.1 | 12.1 | 42.9 | MEDIUM |
| Malta | T20 | 3 | 97 | 92 | 32.3 | 105.4 | 10.9 | 35.9 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 3 | 95 | 87 | 95.0 | 109.2 | 9.2 | 32.2 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 4 | 53 | 73 | 13.3 | 72.6 | 9.6 | 57.5 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 3 | 53 | 66 | 17.7 | 80.3 | 4.5 | 39.4 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 4 | 64 | 65 | 16.0 | 98.5 | 6.2 | 33.8 | LOW |
| Bulgaria | T20 | 2 | 55 | 50 | 27.5 | 110.0 | 10.0 | 44.0 | LOW |
| Gibraltar | T20 | 2 | 72 | 49 | 72.0 | 146.9 | 12.2 | 14.3 | LOW |
| Israel | T20 | 1 | 57 | 48 | 57.0 | 118.8 | 18.8 | 37.5 | LOW |
| Hungary | T20 | 2 | 42 | 41 | 21.0 | 102.4 | 12.2 | 41.5 | LOW |
| Guernsey | T20 | 1 | 47 | 38 | 47.0 | 123.7 | 18.4 | 39.5 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 2 | 47 | 34 | 47.0 | 138.2 | 14.7 | 20.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Austria | T20 | 36 | 38 | 3 | 6.3 | 12.7 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 36 | 60 | 0 | 10.0 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 9 | 209 | 220 | 23.2 | 95.0 | 9.1 | 40.0 | MEDIUM |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 7 | 139 | 129 | 27.8 | 107.8 | 8.5 | 31.0 | MEDIUM |
| GB Oval, Szodliget | T20 | 4 | 116 | 111 | 38.7 | 104.5 | 9.9 | 37.8 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 112 | 107 | 28.0 | 104.7 | 12.1 | 46.7 | LOW |
| Pierre Werner Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 71 | 69 | 23.7 | 102.9 | 10.1 | 36.2 | LOW |
| Roma Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 58 | 55 | 14.5 | 105.5 | 16.4 | 43.6 | LOW |
| Europa Sports Complex | T20 | 2 | 72 | 49 | 72.0 | 146.9 | 12.2 | 14.3 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 33 | 49 | 6.6 | 67.3 | 10.2 | 67.3 | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 1 | 36 | 42 | 36.0 | 85.7 | 11.9 | 50.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 60 | 86 | 2 | 8.6 | 43.0 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 60 | 55 | 2 | 5.5 | 27.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 39 | 846 | 831 | 24.2 | 101.8 | 10.5 | 39.7 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 215 | 274 | 9 | 7.6 | 30.4 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 26 | 511 | 447 | 31.9 | 114.3 | 12.1 | 33.6 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 30 | 222 | 304 | 18.5 | 73.0 | 6.9 | 52.6 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 10 | 113 | 80 | 16.1 | 141.3 | 15.0 | 25.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 138 | 183 | 3 | 8.0 | 61.0 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 53 | 70 | 5 | 7.9 | 14.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 33 | 403 | 445 | 22.4 | 90.6 | 8.8 | 42.7 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 25 | 302 | 273 | 23.2 | 110.6 | 11.4 | 38.5 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 14 | 141 | 113 | 35.3 | 124.8 | 15.0 | 31.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.