SL Kalis betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | LIST_A | 47 | 1220 | 1735 | 30.5 | 70.3 | 8.1 | 58.9 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 51 | 1462 | 1379 | 35.7 | 106.0 | 13.7 | 43.7 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 5 | 106 | 230 | 21.2 | 46.1 | 4.3 | 68.7 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where SL Kalis scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Central Sparks (LIST A)HIGH sample
269 runs off 379 balls in 7 LIST A matches — strike rate 71.0 vs 70.3 overall, average 44.8 vs 30.5 overall.
- Opposition: Thunder (LIST A)HIGH sample
304 runs off 378 balls in 8 LIST A matches — strike rate 80.4 vs 70.3 overall, average 50.7 vs 30.5 overall.
- Venue: Headingley, Leeds (LIST A)HIGH sample
373 runs off 530 balls in 11 LIST A matches — strike rate 70.4 vs 70.3 overall, average 41.4 vs 30.5 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
715 runs off 652 balls in 36 T20 matches — strike rate 109.7 vs 106.0 overall, average 44.7 vs 35.7 overall.
- Opposition: Scotland (T20)MEDIUM sample
287 runs off 228 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 125.9 vs 106.0 overall, average 71.8 vs 35.7 overall.
- Opposition: United States of America (T20)MEDIUM sample
144 runs off 123 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 117.1 vs 106.0 overall, average 48.0 vs 35.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
518 runs off 578 balls in 46 T20 matches — strike rate 89.6 vs 106.0 overall, average 34.5 vs 35.7 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (LIST A)HIGH sample
271 runs off 548 balls in 34 LIST A matches — strike rate 49.5 vs 70.3 overall, average 22.6 vs 30.5 overall.
- Opposition: Southern Vipers (LIST A)MEDIUM sample
150 runs off 252 balls in 8 LIST A matches — strike rate 59.5 vs 70.3 overall, average 18.8 vs 30.5 overall.
- Opposition: Thailand (T20)MEDIUM sample
204 runs off 245 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 83.3 vs 106.0 overall, average 25.5 vs 35.7 overall.
- Venue: Riverside Ground, Chester-le-Street (LIST A)MEDIUM sample
157 runs off 238 balls in 8 LIST A matches — strike rate 66.0 vs 70.3 overall, average 19.6 vs 30.5 overall.
- Venue: Royal Chiangmai Golf Club (T20)MEDIUM sample
127 runs off 157 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 80.9 vs 106.0 overall, average 42.3 vs 35.7 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Central Sparks | LIST_A | 7 | 269 | 379 | 44.8 | 71.0 | 7.7 | 57.8 | HIGH |
| Thunder | LIST_A | 8 | 304 | 378 | 50.7 | 80.4 | 11.9 | 60.3 | HIGH |
| South East Stars | LIST_A | 5 | 202 | 263 | 67.3 | 76.8 | 6.5 | 47.5 | MEDIUM |
| Southern Vipers | LIST_A | 8 | 150 | 252 | 18.8 | 59.5 | 7.1 | 64.3 | MEDIUM |
| Thailand | T20 | 10 | 204 | 245 | 25.5 | 83.3 | 9.4 | 51.4 | MEDIUM |
| Thailand | ODI | 5 | 106 | 230 | 21.2 | 46.1 | 4.3 | 68.7 | MEDIUM |
| Scotland | T20 | 6 | 287 | 228 | 71.8 | 125.9 | 18.9 | 39.5 | MEDIUM |
| Sunrisers | LIST_A | 6 | 140 | 213 | 28.0 | 65.7 | 6.1 | 57.7 | MEDIUM |
| Western Storm | LIST_A | 6 | 126 | 165 | 25.2 | 76.4 | 9.7 | 57.6 | MEDIUM |
| Nepal | T20 | 4 | 165 | 146 | 55.0 | 113.0 | 13.7 | 39.7 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia | T20 | 5 | 126 | 126 | 31.5 | 100.0 | 12.7 | 42.9 | MEDIUM |
| United States of America | T20 | 5 | 144 | 123 | 48.0 | 117.1 | 14.6 | 36.6 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 2 | 60 | 66 | 30.0 | 90.9 | 12.1 | 50.0 | LOW |
| The Blaze | LIST_A | 3 | 18 | 58 | 6.0 | 31.0 | 3.4 | 82.8 | LOW |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 2 | 74 | 54 | 74.0 | 137.0 | 16.7 | 27.8 | LOW |
| Vanuatu | T20 | 1 | 70 | 51 | 70.0 | 137.3 | 17.6 | 37.3 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 2 | 40 | 44 | 20.0 | 90.9 | 13.6 | 56.8 | LOW |
| Australia | T20 | 1 | 44 | 43 | 44.0 | 102.3 | 14.0 | 41.9 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 3 | 36 | 42 | 12.0 | 85.7 | 11.9 | 52.4 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 1 | 40 | 38 | 40.0 | 105.3 | 13.2 | 42.1 | LOW |
| Italy | T20 | 2 | 44 | 35 | 44.0 | 125.7 | 8.6 | 28.6 | LOW |
| Uganda | T20 | 1 | 32 | 32 | 32.0 | 100.0 | 15.6 | 50.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Headingley, Leeds | LIST_A | 11 | 373 | 530 | 41.4 | 70.4 | 8.7 | 57.9 | HIGH |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 10 | 305 | 267 | 43.6 | 114.2 | 16.5 | 43.1 | MEDIUM |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 8 | 296 | 250 | 59.2 | 118.4 | 14.0 | 36.0 | MEDIUM |
| Riverside Ground, Chester-le-Street | LIST_A | 8 | 157 | 238 | 19.6 | 66.0 | 8.8 | 66.8 | MEDIUM |
| Royal Chiangmai Golf Club | ODI | 4 | 95 | 211 | 23.8 | 45.0 | 3.8 | 68.2 | MEDIUM |
| North Marine Road Ground, Scarborough | LIST_A | 3 | 114 | 174 | 114.0 | 65.5 | 5.7 | 55.7 | MEDIUM |
| Royal Chiangmai Golf Club | T20 | 4 | 127 | 157 | 42.3 | 80.9 | 8.9 | 49.7 | MEDIUM |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 5 | 175 | 157 | 43.8 | 111.5 | 16.6 | 43.3 | MEDIUM |
| Roseworth Terrace, Gosforth | LIST_A | 2 | 58 | 105 | 29.0 | 55.2 | 7.6 | 71.4 | LOW |
| Trafalgar Road Ground, Southport | LIST_A | 1 | 100 | 95 | 100.0 | 105.3 | 17.9 | 50.5 | LOW |
| County Ground, New Road, Worcester | LIST_A | 2 | 62 | 90 | 31.0 | 68.9 | 2.2 | 54.4 | LOW |
| Tolerance Oval, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 2 | 104 | 88 | 52.0 | 118.2 | 14.8 | 42.0 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 3 | 73 | 81 | 36.5 | 90.1 | 11.1 | 46.9 | LOW |
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 2 | 96 | 78 | 96.0 | 123.1 | 12.8 | 30.8 | LOW |
| Edgbaston, Birmingham | LIST_A | 1 | 55 | 75 | 55.0 | 73.3 | 9.3 | 57.3 | LOW |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 2 | 64 | 72 | 32.0 | 88.9 | 13.9 | 58.3 | LOW |
| County Ground, Chelmsford | LIST_A | 2 | 50 | 71 | 25.0 | 70.4 | 7.0 | 56.3 | LOW |
| Rookwood, Sale | LIST_A | 2 | 43 | 62 | 43.0 | 69.4 | 4.8 | 53.2 | LOW |
| The Cooper Associates County Ground, Taunton | LIST_A | 2 | 53 | 61 | 53.0 | 86.9 | 11.5 | 49.2 | LOW |
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 2 | 56 | 49 | 28.0 | 114.3 | 14.3 | 40.8 | LOW |
| The Rose Bowl, Southampton | LIST_A | 1 | 23 | 48 | 23.0 | 47.9 | 6.3 | 75.0 | LOW |
| Kent County Cricket Ground, Beckenham | LIST_A | 2 | 58 | 47 | 58.0 | 123.4 | 12.8 | 27.7 | LOW |
| County Ground, Bristol | T20 | 2 | 38 | 47 | 19.0 | 80.9 | 10.6 | 51.1 | LOW |
| The Rose Bowl, Southampton | T20 | 1 | 44 | 43 | 44.0 | 102.3 | 14.0 | 41.9 | LOW |
| College Ground, Cheltenham | LIST_A | 1 | 34 | 37 | 34.0 | 91.9 | 10.8 | 51.4 | LOW |
| County Ground, Northampton | LIST_A | 1 | 18 | 33 | 18.0 | 54.5 | 3.0 | 54.5 | LOW |
| Queen's Park, Chesterfield | LIST_A | 1 | 12 | 33 | 12.0 | 36.4 | 3.0 | 75.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | LIST_A | 47 | 1220 | 1735 | 30.5 | 70.3 | 8.1 | 58.9 | HIGH |
| Unknown | T20 | 51 | 1462 | 1379 | 35.7 | 106.0 | 13.7 | 43.7 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 5 | 106 | 230 | 21.2 | 46.1 | 4.3 | 68.7 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | LIST_A | 34 | 853 | 1100 | 35.5 | 77.5 | 8.8 | 53.8 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 36 | 715 | 652 | 44.7 | 109.7 | 13.5 | 38.8 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 46 | 518 | 578 | 34.5 | 89.6 | 11.8 | 53.1 | HIGH |
| powerplay | LIST_A | 34 | 271 | 548 | 22.6 | 49.5 | 6.4 | 74.3 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 16 | 229 | 149 | 22.9 | 153.7 | 22.1 | 28.2 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | ODI | 5 | 51 | 122 | 25.5 | 41.8 | 4.1 | 73.0 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 3 | 55 | 108 | 18.3 | 50.9 | 4.6 | 63.9 | LOW |
| death | LIST_A | 6 | 96 | 87 | 24.0 | 110.3 | 10.3 | 26.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | LIST_A | 39 | 632 | 854 | 31.6 | 74.0 | 7.8 | 54.9 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 45 | 908 | 848 | 37.8 | 107.1 | 14.2 | 43.9 | HIGH |
| PACE | LIST_A | 40 | 554 | 816 | 30.8 | 67.9 | 8.6 | 62.5 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 44 | 515 | 493 | 34.3 | 104.5 | 13.2 | 43.8 | HIGH |
| SPIN | ODI | 4 | 81 | 153 | 27.0 | 52.9 | 4.6 | 64.1 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 5 | 25 | 77 | 12.5 | 32.5 | 3.9 | 77.9 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | LIST_A | 9 | 34 | 65 | 17.0 | 52.3 | 6.2 | 66.2 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 7 | 39 | 38 | 19.5 | 102.6 | 10.5 | 36.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.