STRA de Silva betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 12 | 173 | 200 | 19.2 | 86.5 | 7.0 | 48.5 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 78 | 127 | 2 | 9.8 | 63.5 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where STRA de Silva scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
95 runs off 100 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 95.0 vs 86.5 overall, average 15.8 vs 19.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Kenya (T20)LOW sample
56 runs off 76 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 73.7 vs 86.5 overall, average 18.7 vs 19.2 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
55 runs off 72 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 76.4 vs 86.5 overall, average 18.3 vs 19.2 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
84 runs off 112 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 75.0 vs 86.5 overall, average 28.0 vs 19.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Kenya | T20 | 3 | 56 | 76 | 18.7 | 73.7 | 5.3 | 53.9 | LOW |
| St Helena | T20 | 1 | 51 | 57 | — | 89.5 | 8.8 | 47.4 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Achimota Senior Secondary School A Field, Accra | T20 | 2 | 53 | 61 | 53.0 | 86.9 | 8.2 | 49.2 | LOW |
| Ruaraka Sports Club Ground, Nairobi | T20 | 2 | 39 | 48 | 19.5 | 81.3 | 8.3 | 54.2 | LOW |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 1 | 19 | 32 | 19.0 | 59.4 | 0.0 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Integrated Polytechnic Regional Centre | T20 | 2 | 46 | 30 | 46.0 | 153.3 | 13.3 | 23.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 12 | 173 | 200 | 19.2 | 86.5 | 7.0 | 48.5 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 78 | 127 | 2 | 9.8 | 63.5 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 8 | 84 | 112 | 28.0 | 75.0 | 3.6 | 46.4 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 7 | 27 | 47 | 6.8 | 57.4 | 6.4 | 66.0 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 4 | 62 | 41 | 31.0 | 151.2 | 17.1 | 34.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 48 | 77 | 1 | 9.6 | 77.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 11 | 95 | 100 | 15.8 | 95.0 | 10.0 | 50.0 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 5 | 55 | 72 | 18.3 | 76.4 | 5.6 | 50.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.