Surya Anand betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 22 | 301 | 269 | 30.1 | 111.9 | 8.6 | 30.5 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 505 | 545 | 24 | 6.5 | 22.7 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Surya Anand scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
162 runs off 120 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 135.0 vs 111.9 overall, average 23.1 vs 30.1 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
100 runs off 82 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 122.0 vs 111.9 overall, average 20.0 vs 30.1 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
82 runs off 61 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 134.4 vs 111.9 overall, average 41.0 vs 30.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Svanholm Park, Brondby (T20)MEDIUM sample
163 runs off 167 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 97.6 vs 111.9 overall, average 27.2 vs 30.1 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
119 runs off 126 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 94.4 vs 111.9 overall, average 39.7 vs 30.1 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
134 runs off 141 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 95.0 vs 111.9 overall, average 44.7 vs 30.1 overall.
- Opposition: Jersey (T20)LOW sample
61 runs off 68 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 89.7 vs 111.9 overall, average 61.0 vs 30.1 overall.
- Opposition: Finland (T20)LOW sample
60 runs off 60 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 100.0 vs 111.9 overall, average 30.0 vs 30.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Jersey | T20 | 3 | 61 | 68 | 61.0 | 89.7 | 2.9 | 30.9 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 4 | 60 | 60 | 30.0 | 100.0 | 5.0 | 28.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Germany | T20 | 84 | 123 | 5 | 8.8 | 24.6 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 72 | 54 | 1 | 4.5 | 54.0 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 48 | 56 | 2 | 7.0 | 28.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 13 | 163 | 167 | 27.2 | 97.6 | 6.0 | 32.3 | MEDIUM |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 3 | 63 | 57 | 31.5 | 110.5 | 7.0 | 28.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 270 | 305 | 13 | 6.8 | 23.5 | MEDIUM |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 61 | 56 | 5 | 5.5 | 11.2 | LOW |
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 48 | 52 | 2 | 6.5 | 26.0 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 42 | 42 | 3 | 6.0 | 14.0 | LOW |
| Goldenacre, Edinburgh | T20 | 36 | 41 | 0 | 6.8 | — | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 36 | 29 | 1 | 4.8 | 29.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 22 | 301 | 269 | 30.1 | 111.9 | 8.6 | 30.5 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 505 | 545 | 24 | 6.5 | 22.7 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 11 | 134 | 141 | 44.7 | 95.0 | 6.4 | 34.0 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 19 | 162 | 120 | 23.1 | 135.0 | 11.7 | 25.8 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 390 | 392 | 20 | 6.0 | 19.6 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 72 | 86 | 2 | 7.2 | 43.0 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 43 | 67 | 2 | 9.3 | 33.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 14 | 119 | 126 | 39.7 | 94.4 | 4.0 | 30.2 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 17 | 100 | 82 | 20.0 | 122.0 | 11.0 | 30.5 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 82 | 61 | 41.0 | 134.4 | 14.8 | 31.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.