T Bharaj betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 28 | 614 | 498 | 25.6 | 123.3 | 14.1 | 37.1 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where T Bharaj scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
300 runs off 216 balls in 25 T20 matches — strike rate 138.9 vs 123.3 overall, average 25.0 vs 25.6 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
212 runs off 188 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 112.8 vs 123.3 overall, average 42.4 vs 25.6 overall.
- Opposition: Finland (T20)LOW sample
119 runs off 90 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 132.2 vs 123.3 overall, average 39.7 vs 25.6 overall.
- Venue: King George V Sports Ground, Castel (T20)LOW sample
82 runs off 60 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 136.7 vs 123.3 overall, average 27.3 vs 25.6 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
107 runs off 71 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 150.7 vs 123.3 overall, average 17.8 vs 25.6 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Svanholm Park, Brondby (T20)MEDIUM sample
178 runs off 161 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 110.6 vs 123.3 overall, average 19.8 vs 25.6 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
287 runs off 251 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 114.3 vs 123.3 overall, average 31.9 vs 25.6 overall.
- Opposition: Germany (T20)LOW sample
103 runs off 102 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 101.0 vs 123.3 overall, average 25.8 vs 25.6 overall.
- Venue: Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh (T20)LOW sample
107 runs off 98 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 109.2 vs 123.3 overall, average 26.8 vs 25.6 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
102 runs off 94 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 108.5 vs 123.3 overall, average 14.6 vs 25.6 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Germany | T20 | 5 | 103 | 102 | 25.8 | 101.0 | 6.9 | 38.2 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 4 | 119 | 90 | 39.7 | 132.2 | 8.9 | 28.9 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 3 | 83 | 68 | 27.7 | 122.1 | 13.2 | 32.4 | LOW |
| Italy | T20 | 1 | 52 | 43 | 52.0 | 120.9 | 16.3 | 39.5 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 1 | 58 | 41 | — | 141.5 | 24.4 | 43.9 | LOW |
| Cyprus | T20 | 1 | 46 | 31 | 46.0 | 148.4 | 22.6 | 41.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 11 | 178 | 161 | 19.8 | 110.6 | 9.3 | 37.9 | MEDIUM |
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 4 | 107 | 98 | 26.8 | 109.2 | 11.2 | 42.9 | LOW |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 4 | 94 | 72 | 31.3 | 130.6 | 19.4 | 40.3 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 3 | 82 | 60 | 27.3 | 136.7 | 20.0 | 41.7 | LOW |
| Goldenacre, Edinburgh | T20 | 2 | 53 | 40 | 26.5 | 132.5 | 15.0 | 25.0 | LOW |
| Ishoj Cricket Club, Vejledalen | T20 | 1 | 54 | 34 | — | 158.8 | 14.7 | 20.6 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 28 | 614 | 498 | 25.6 | 123.3 | 14.1 | 37.1 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 16 | 287 | 251 | 31.9 | 114.3 | 9.2 | 33.1 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 18 | 220 | 176 | 24.4 | 125.0 | 19.9 | 46.0 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 9 | 107 | 71 | 17.8 | 150.7 | 16.9 | 29.6 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 25 | 300 | 216 | 25.0 | 138.9 | 20.4 | 39.8 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 17 | 212 | 188 | 42.4 | 112.8 | 9.0 | 33.0 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 102 | 94 | 14.6 | 108.5 | 9.6 | 39.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.