T Chanderpaul betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | TEST | 15 | 758 | 2001 | 29.2 | 37.9 | 3.9 | 79.3 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where T Chanderpaul scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (TEST)HIGH sample
153 runs off 389 balls in 11 TEST matches — strike rate 39.3 vs 37.9 overall, average 38.3 vs 29.2 overall.
- Venue: Perth Stadium (TEST)MEDIUM sample
96 runs off 202 balls in 1 TEST match — strike rate 47.5 vs 37.9 overall, average 48.0 vs 29.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: India (TEST)HIGH sample
128 runs off 395 balls in 4 TEST matches — strike rate 32.4 vs 37.9 overall, average 18.3 vs 29.2 overall.
- Opposition: New Zealand (TEST)MEDIUM sample
58 runs off 214 balls in 1 TEST match — strike rate 27.1 vs 37.9 overall, average 29.0 vs 29.2 overall.
- Opposition: South Africa (TEST)MEDIUM sample
35 runs off 123 balls in 2 TEST matches — strike rate 28.5 vs 37.9 overall, average 11.7 vs 29.2 overall.
- Venue: Hagley Oval, Christchurch (TEST)MEDIUM sample
58 runs off 214 balls in 1 TEST match — strike rate 27.1 vs 37.9 overall, average 29.0 vs 29.2 overall.
- Venue: Adelaide Oval (TEST)MEDIUM sample
70 runs off 155 balls in 2 TEST matches — strike rate 45.2 vs 37.9 overall, average 17.5 vs 29.2 overall.
- Venue: Windsor Park, Roseau, Dominica (TEST)LOW sample
19 runs off 72 balls in 1 TEST match — strike rate 26.4 vs 37.9 overall, average 9.5 vs 29.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Zimbabwe | TEST | 2 | 258 | 607 | 129.0 | 42.5 | 3.8 | 75.6 | HIGH |
| Australia | TEST | 4 | 191 | 431 | 23.9 | 44.3 | 5.1 | 77.7 | HIGH |
| India | TEST | 4 | 128 | 395 | 18.3 | 32.4 | 3.5 | 81.8 | HIGH |
| Pakistan | TEST | 2 | 88 | 231 | 22.0 | 38.1 | 4.3 | 81.0 | MEDIUM |
| New Zealand | TEST | 1 | 58 | 214 | 29.0 | 27.1 | 1.9 | 83.2 | MEDIUM |
| South Africa | TEST | 2 | 35 | 123 | 11.7 | 28.5 | 4.1 | 85.4 | MEDIUM |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | TEST | 2 | 258 | 607 | 129.0 | 42.5 | 3.8 | 75.6 | HIGH |
| Queen's Park Oval, Port of Spain, Trinidad | TEST | 2 | 89 | 249 | 29.7 | 35.7 | 4.0 | 80.7 | MEDIUM |
| Hagley Oval, Christchurch | TEST | 1 | 58 | 214 | 29.0 | 27.1 | 1.9 | 83.2 | MEDIUM |
| Perth Stadium | TEST | 1 | 96 | 202 | 48.0 | 47.5 | 5.9 | 77.7 | MEDIUM |
| Brian Lara Stadium, Tarouba, Trinidad | TEST | 1 | 56 | 174 | 28.0 | 32.2 | 3.4 | 83.3 | MEDIUM |
| Adelaide Oval | TEST | 2 | 70 | 155 | 17.5 | 45.2 | 5.2 | 77.4 | MEDIUM |
| Arun Jaitley Stadium, Delhi | TEST | 1 | 44 | 97 | 22.0 | 45.4 | 6.2 | 77.3 | LOW |
| SuperSport Park, Centurion | TEST | 1 | 32 | 79 | 16.0 | 40.5 | 6.3 | 81.0 | LOW |
| Brisbane Cricket Ground, Woolloongabba, Brisbane | TEST | 1 | 25 | 74 | 12.5 | 33.8 | 2.7 | 78.4 | LOW |
| Windsor Park, Roseau, Dominica | TEST | 1 | 19 | 72 | 9.5 | 26.4 | 1.4 | 81.9 | LOW |
| The Wanderers Stadium, Johannesburg | TEST | 1 | 3 | 44 | 3.0 | 6.8 | 0.0 | 93.2 | LOW |
| Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad | TEST | 1 | 8 | 34 | 4.0 | 23.5 | 2.9 | 88.2 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | TEST | 15 | 758 | 2001 | 29.2 | 37.9 | 3.9 | 79.3 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| old_ball | TEST | 12 | 513 | 1218 | 34.2 | 42.1 | 4.2 | 77.0 | HIGH |
| new_ball | TEST | 15 | 245 | 783 | 22.3 | 31.3 | 3.4 | 82.9 | HIGH |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | TEST | 15 | 505 | 1387 | 26.6 | 36.4 | 3.8 | 80.2 | HIGH |
| SPIN | TEST | 11 | 153 | 389 | 38.3 | 39.3 | 3.9 | 76.9 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | TEST | 6 | 100 | 225 | 33.3 | 44.4 | 4.4 | 77.8 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.