T Marumani betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 65 | 1355 | 1004 | 23.0 | 135.0 | 19.4 | 40.8 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 16 | 216 | 320 | 16.6 | 67.5 | 8.1 | 63.7 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where T Marumani scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)MEDIUM sample
292 runs off 214 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 136.4 vs 135.0 overall, average 41.7 vs 23.0 overall.
- Venue: Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo (T20)MEDIUM sample
208 runs off 143 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 145.5 vs 135.0 overall, average 23.1 vs 23.0 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)MEDIUM sample
157 runs off 228 balls in 13 ODI matches — strike rate 68.9 vs 67.5 overall, average 31.4 vs 16.6 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
222 runs off 125 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 177.6 vs 135.0 overall, average 37.0 vs 23.0 overall.
- Opposition: Pakistan (ODI)LOW sample
57 runs off 73 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 78.1 vs 67.5 overall, average 28.5 vs 16.6 overall.
- Opposition: Pakistan (T20)LOW sample
98 runs off 67 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 146.3 vs 135.0 overall, average 19.6 vs 23.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Harare Sports Club (T20)HIGH sample
398 runs off 348 balls in 22 T20 matches — strike rate 114.4 vs 135.0 overall, average 19.9 vs 23.0 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
660 runs off 538 balls in 57 T20 matches — strike rate 122.7 vs 135.0 overall, average 22.0 vs 23.0 overall.
- Opposition: India (T20)MEDIUM sample
144 runs off 126 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 114.3 vs 135.0 overall, average 24.0 vs 23.0 overall.
- Opposition: Sri Lanka (T20)LOW sample
123 runs off 98 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 125.5 vs 135.0 overall, average 20.5 vs 23.0 overall.
- Opposition: Bangladesh (ODI)LOW sample
47 runs off 87 balls in 5 ODI matches — strike rate 54.0 vs 67.5 overall, average 9.4 vs 16.6 overall.
- Opposition: Kenya (T20)LOW sample
89 runs off 81 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 109.9 vs 135.0 overall, average 22.3 vs 23.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Namibia | T20 | 9 | 292 | 214 | 41.7 | 136.4 | 15.4 | 31.8 | MEDIUM |
| Australia | ODI | 3 | 84 | 126 | 28.0 | 66.7 | 6.3 | 60.3 | MEDIUM |
| India | T20 | 7 | 144 | 126 | 24.0 | 114.3 | 14.3 | 44.4 | MEDIUM |
| Sri Lanka | T20 | 6 | 123 | 98 | 20.5 | 125.5 | 20.4 | 43.9 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | ODI | 5 | 47 | 87 | 9.4 | 54.0 | 6.9 | 69.0 | LOW |
| Kenya | T20 | 4 | 89 | 81 | 22.3 | 109.9 | 14.8 | 46.9 | LOW |
| Pakistan | ODI | 3 | 57 | 73 | 28.5 | 78.1 | 11.0 | 65.8 | LOW |
| Tanzania | T20 | 3 | 93 | 68 | 46.5 | 136.8 | 16.2 | 33.8 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 7 | 70 | 67 | 10.0 | 104.5 | 14.9 | 52.2 | LOW |
| Pakistan | T20 | 5 | 98 | 67 | 19.6 | 146.3 | 23.9 | 40.3 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 2 | 94 | 49 | 47.0 | 191.8 | 30.6 | 32.7 | LOW |
| Nigeria | T20 | 2 | 47 | 47 | 47.0 | 100.0 | 12.8 | 46.8 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 8 | 21 | 45 | 2.6 | 46.7 | 4.4 | 71.1 | LOW |
| Seychelles | T20 | 1 | 86 | 37 | 86.0 | 232.4 | 40.5 | 24.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 22 | 398 | 348 | 19.9 | 114.4 | 14.1 | 41.7 | HIGH |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | T20 | 9 | 208 | 143 | 23.1 | 145.5 | 21.0 | 38.5 | MEDIUM |
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 10 | 75 | 121 | 9.4 | 62.0 | 8.3 | 66.1 | MEDIUM |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School A Field, Accra | T20 | 5 | 120 | 109 | 30.0 | 110.1 | 14.7 | 44.0 | LOW |
| Tony Ireland Stadium, Townsville | ODI | 2 | 49 | 79 | 24.5 | 62.0 | 5.1 | 62.0 | LOW |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | ODI | 3 | 57 | 73 | 28.5 | 78.1 | 11.0 | 65.8 | LOW |
| Gymkhana Club Ground, Nairobi | T20 | 3 | 110 | 60 | 55.0 | 183.3 | 30.0 | 28.3 | LOW |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 66 | 53 | 33.0 | 124.5 | 15.1 | 43.4 | LOW |
| Riverway Stadium, Townsville | ODI | 1 | 35 | 47 | 35.0 | 74.5 | 8.5 | 57.4 | LOW |
| R Premadasa Stadium, Colombo | T20 | 2 | 69 | 47 | 34.5 | 146.8 | 27.7 | 42.6 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 5 | 64 | 42 | 16.0 | 152.4 | 16.7 | 35.7 | LOW |
| Ruaraka Sports Club Ground, Nairobi | T20 | 2 | 106 | 37 | 53.0 | 286.5 | 56.8 | 27.0 | LOW |
| Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium | T20 | 4 | 48 | 36 | 12.0 | 133.3 | 22.2 | 44.4 | LOW |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 2 | 56 | 33 | 28.0 | 169.7 | 24.2 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Zahur Ahmed Chowdhury Stadium, Chattogram | T20 | 2 | 33 | 30 | 16.5 | 110.0 | 10.0 | 33.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 39 | 909 | 620 | 26.0 | 146.6 | 22.3 | 40.2 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 22 | 398 | 348 | 19.9 | 114.4 | 14.1 | 41.7 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 6 | 141 | 199 | 28.2 | 70.9 | 8.0 | 62.3 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 10 | 75 | 121 | 9.4 | 62.0 | 8.3 | 66.1 | MEDIUM |
| Pakistan | T20 | 4 | 48 | 36 | 12.0 | 133.3 | 22.2 | 44.4 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 57 | 794 | 612 | 22.7 | 129.7 | 21.6 | 48.2 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 26 | 467 | 329 | 22.2 | 141.9 | 16.1 | 29.2 | HIGH |
| powerplay | ODI | 13 | 148 | 231 | 18.5 | 64.1 | 8.7 | 68.4 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 5 | 48 | 80 | 9.6 | 60.0 | 3.8 | 56.3 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 7 | 94 | 63 | 31.3 | 149.2 | 15.9 | 30.2 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 57 | 660 | 538 | 22.0 | 122.7 | 18.4 | 45.2 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 47 | 473 | 341 | 20.6 | 138.7 | 18.5 | 39.3 | HIGH |
| PACE | ODI | 13 | 157 | 228 | 31.4 | 68.9 | 8.3 | 63.2 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 20 | 222 | 125 | 37.0 | 177.6 | 26.4 | 26.4 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | ODI | 10 | 45 | 80 | 5.6 | 56.3 | 6.3 | 68.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.