T Ruma betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 15 | 447 | 443 | 40.6 | 100.9 | 12.2 | 46.0 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 8 | 232 | 358 | 33.1 | 64.8 | 7.3 | 62.8 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 42 | 30 | 2 | 4.3 | 15.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where T Ruma scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Tolerance Oval, Abu Dhabi (T20)MEDIUM sample
163 runs off 123 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 132.5 vs 100.9 overall, average 54.3 vs 40.6 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
251 runs off 225 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 111.6 vs 100.9 overall, average 50.2 vs 40.6 overall.
- Phase: middle (ODI)MEDIUM sample
173 runs off 259 balls in 6 ODI matches — strike rate 66.8 vs 64.8 overall, average 43.3 vs 33.1 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
278 runs off 254 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 109.4 vs 100.9 overall, average 69.5 vs 40.6 overall.
- Opposition: Netherlands (ODI)LOW sample
79 runs off 99 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 79.8 vs 64.8 overall, average 39.5 vs 33.1 overall.
- Opposition: United States of America (ODI)LOW sample
80 runs off 93 balls in 1 ODI match — strike rate 86.0 vs 64.8 overall, not yet dismissed vs 33.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Zimbabwe (T20)MEDIUM sample
131 runs off 159 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 82.4 vs 100.9 overall, average 43.7 vs 40.6 overall.
- Venue: Harare Sports Club (T20)MEDIUM sample
106 runs off 124 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 85.5 vs 100.9 overall, average 53.0 vs 40.6 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
136 runs off 162 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 84.0 vs 100.9 overall, average 27.2 vs 40.6 overall.
- Opposition: Zimbabwe (ODI)LOW sample
28 runs off 91 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 30.8 vs 64.8 overall, average 14.0 vs 33.1 overall.
- Opposition: Thailand (T20)LOW sample
47 runs off 67 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 70.1 vs 100.9 overall, average 23.5 vs 40.6 overall.
- Venue: Harare Sports Club (ODI)LOW sample
28 runs off 91 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 30.8 vs 64.8 overall, average 14.0 vs 33.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 4 | 131 | 159 | 43.7 | 82.4 | 10.7 | 54.1 | MEDIUM |
| Netherlands | ODI | 2 | 79 | 99 | 39.5 | 79.8 | 10.1 | 57.6 | LOW |
| United States of America | ODI | 1 | 80 | 93 | — | 86.0 | 7.5 | 46.2 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 2 | 28 | 91 | 14.0 | 30.8 | 3.3 | 81.3 | LOW |
| Scotland | ODI | 3 | 45 | 75 | 15.0 | 60.0 | 8.0 | 68.0 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 2 | 47 | 67 | 23.5 | 70.1 | 3.0 | 47.8 | LOW |
| Vanuatu | T20 | 1 | 28 | 45 | 28.0 | 62.2 | 4.4 | 53.3 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 2 | 74 | 43 | 74.0 | 172.1 | 27.9 | 23.3 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 1 | 53 | 35 | 53.0 | 151.4 | 22.9 | 42.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 106 | 124 | 53.0 | 85.5 | 12.1 | 52.4 | MEDIUM |
| Tolerance Oval, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 4 | 163 | 123 | 54.3 | 132.5 | 17.9 | 37.4 | MEDIUM |
| ICC Academy, Dubai | ODI | 2 | 100 | 119 | 100.0 | 84.0 | 9.2 | 51.3 | LOW |
| Vanuatu Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 96 | 98 | 32.0 | 98.0 | 10.2 | 45.9 | LOW |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 2 | 79 | 97 | 39.5 | 81.4 | 10.3 | 56.7 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 2 | 28 | 91 | 14.0 | 30.8 | 3.3 | 81.3 | LOW |
| Amini Park, Port Moresby | T20 | 2 | 47 | 67 | 23.5 | 70.1 | 3.0 | 47.8 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 2 | 25 | 51 | 12.5 | 49.0 | 3.9 | 68.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 42 | 30 | 2 | 4.3 | 15.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 12 | 341 | 319 | 37.9 | 106.9 | 12.2 | 43.6 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 6 | 204 | 267 | 40.8 | 76.4 | 8.6 | 56.6 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 106 | 124 | 53.0 | 85.5 | 12.1 | 52.4 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 2 | 28 | 91 | 14.0 | 30.8 | 3.3 | 81.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | ODI | 42 | 30 | 2 | 4.3 | 15.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | ODI | 6 | 173 | 259 | 43.3 | 66.8 | 6.2 | 58.7 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 14 | 278 | 254 | 69.5 | 109.4 | 13.4 | 42.9 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 12 | 85 | 104 | 85.0 | 81.7 | 9.6 | 55.8 | LOW |
| powerplay | ODI | 6 | 50 | 91 | 25.0 | 54.9 | 9.9 | 76.9 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 8 | 84 | 85 | 14.0 | 98.8 | 11.8 | 43.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 12 | 251 | 225 | 50.2 | 111.6 | 13.3 | 41.3 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | ODI | 7 | 159 | 223 | 39.8 | 71.3 | 7.6 | 57.4 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 13 | 136 | 162 | 27.2 | 84.0 | 10.5 | 54.3 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 6 | 60 | 100 | 30.0 | 60.0 | 8.0 | 71.0 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 7 | 60 | 56 | 60.0 | 107.1 | 12.5 | 41.1 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | ODI | 3 | 13 | 35 | 13.0 | 37.1 | 2.9 | 74.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.