T Sandeep betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 15 | 317 | 275 | 26.4 | 115.3 | 16.7 | 40.4 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where T Sandeep scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
173 runs off 135 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 128.1 vs 115.3 overall, average 43.3 vs 26.4 overall.
- Venue: Malkerns Country Club oval (T20)LOW sample
143 runs off 101 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 141.6 vs 115.3 overall, average 28.6 vs 26.4 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
143 runs off 104 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 137.5 vs 115.3 overall, average 47.7 vs 26.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
124 runs off 127 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 97.6 vs 115.3 overall, average 17.7 vs 26.4 overall.
- Opposition: Mozambique (T20)LOW sample
117 runs off 110 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 106.4 vs 115.3 overall, average 29.3 vs 26.4 overall.
- Venue: Integrated Polytechnic Regional Centre (T20)LOW sample
104 runs off 103 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 101.0 vs 115.3 overall, average 34.7 vs 26.4 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
91 runs off 99 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 91.9 vs 115.3 overall, average 18.2 vs 26.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Mozambique | T20 | 4 | 117 | 110 | 29.3 | 106.4 | 13.6 | 40.0 | LOW |
| Gambia | T20 | 1 | 62 | 52 | — | 119.2 | 19.2 | 38.5 | LOW |
| Lesotho | T20 | 2 | 64 | 34 | 32.0 | 188.2 | 35.3 | 29.4 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Integrated Polytechnic Regional Centre | T20 | 4 | 104 | 103 | 34.7 | 101.0 | 14.6 | 43.7 | LOW |
| Malkerns Country Club oval | T20 | 5 | 143 | 101 | 28.6 | 141.6 | 21.8 | 33.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 15 | 317 | 275 | 26.4 | 115.3 | 16.7 | 40.4 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 13 | 173 | 135 | 43.3 | 128.1 | 20.7 | 44.4 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 9 | 124 | 127 | 17.7 | 97.6 | 11.0 | 36.2 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 11 | 143 | 104 | 47.7 | 137.5 | 22.1 | 39.4 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 11 | 91 | 99 | 18.2 | 91.9 | 11.1 | 43.4 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 9 | 83 | 72 | 20.8 | 115.3 | 16.7 | 37.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.