TC Barker betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 36 | 610 | 495 | 17.9 | 123.2 | 17.4 | 42.0 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where TC Barker scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Marsa Sports Club (T20)MEDIUM sample
172 runs off 124 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 138.7 vs 123.2 overall, average 21.5 vs 17.9 overall.
- Opposition: Romania (T20)LOW sample
106 runs off 66 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 160.6 vs 123.2 overall, average 53.0 vs 17.9 overall.
- Venue: Roma Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
123 runs off 101 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 121.8 vs 123.2 overall, average 30.8 vs 17.9 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
110 runs off 93 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 118.3 vs 123.2 overall, average 27.5 vs 17.9 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
142 runs off 90 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 157.8 vs 123.2 overall, average 15.8 vs 17.9 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
190 runs off 118 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 161.0 vs 123.2 overall, average 23.8 vs 17.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
358 runs off 312 balls in 34 T20 matches — strike rate 114.7 vs 123.2 overall, average 17.0 vs 17.9 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
393 runs off 368 balls in 35 T20 matches — strike rate 106.8 vs 123.2 overall, average 15.1 vs 17.9 overall.
- Venue: Tikkurila Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
82 runs off 74 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 110.8 vs 123.2 overall, average 16.4 vs 17.9 overall.
- Venue: Kerava National Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
72 runs off 63 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 114.3 vs 123.2 overall, average 24.0 vs 17.9 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Romania | T20 | 3 | 106 | 66 | 53.0 | 160.6 | 24.2 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 4 | 76 | 61 | 19.0 | 124.6 | 18.0 | 41.0 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 4 | 64 | 53 | 16.0 | 120.8 | 20.8 | 47.2 | LOW |
| Isle of Man | T20 | 2 | 60 | 41 | 30.0 | 146.3 | 14.6 | 22.0 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 1 | 59 | 38 | 59.0 | 155.3 | 26.3 | 39.5 | LOW |
| Italy | T20 | 1 | 27 | 31 | 27.0 | 87.1 | 12.9 | 61.3 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 3 | 31 | 31 | 10.3 | 100.0 | 9.7 | 41.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 9 | 172 | 124 | 21.5 | 138.7 | 21.0 | 39.5 | MEDIUM |
| Roma Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 123 | 101 | 30.8 | 121.8 | 18.8 | 46.5 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 82 | 74 | 16.4 | 110.8 | 13.5 | 37.8 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 72 | 63 | 24.0 | 114.3 | 11.1 | 39.7 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 8 | 72 | 57 | 9.0 | 126.3 | 19.3 | 42.1 | LOW |
| GB Oval, Szodliget | T20 | 4 | 57 | 43 | 14.3 | 132.6 | 18.6 | 41.9 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 36 | 610 | 495 | 17.9 | 123.2 | 17.4 | 42.0 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 35 | 393 | 368 | 15.1 | 106.8 | 14.7 | 47.3 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 9 | 190 | 118 | 23.8 | 161.0 | 22.9 | 28.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 34 | 358 | 312 | 17.0 | 114.7 | 15.4 | 42.0 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 15 | 110 | 93 | 27.5 | 118.3 | 15.1 | 44.1 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 12 | 142 | 90 | 15.8 | 157.8 | 26.7 | 40.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.